Purchasing new hardware? Read our latest product comparisons

The science of cute


August 15, 2012

Why do small helpless things – babies, kittens, puppies, pandas in baby form – turn even t...

Why do small helpless things – babies, kittens, puppies, pandas in baby form – turn even the most cynical human into a helpless wreck? (Photo: Shutterstock)

Let’s pretend that a mewling, pooping annoying small thing is deposited in your lap. It needs constant input from you. Before long, it’s taken over your life. You find yourself lavishing attention on this new creature. Going out is a distant memory. But the thing is, the new baby is cute. Really cute. You can’t help but feel protective. You want to look after it.

But why? Why do small helpless things – babies, kittens, puppies, pandas in baby form – turn even the most cynical human into a helpless wreck? Why don’t we have the same reaction to a baby lizard or fish or bird? What, in short, is this cuteness thing all about? It turns out that the science of cute is far more interesting than you’d think. Cuteness is evolution’s devious way of getting you to look after your offspring. Human babies – unlike many other species – are totally dependent on their parents for years after their birth. And you’d find it hard to overlook the constant interruptions to your life if babies weren’t so darn cute.

Zoologist Konrad Loranz argued way back in 1949 that the typical baby face – big eyes, heads large in comparison to their bodies and small noses – turned adults into happy baby-tending machines. More recently, researchers found that babies perceived as more cute made parents more willing to drop everything and look after them. Clever trick, babies.

So why does that transfer to animals? Well, it turns out our brains latch on to pretty much anything with the same criteria. Kittens: big eyes, large heads, small noses. Baby pandas: ditto. Puppies: yep. That might even be one reason why domestic dogs and cats look quite different to their wild ancestors – we’ve bred the cute into them.

Environmental charities know how cute works. Baby harp seals = cute. Clubbing them to death therefore = bad. But fish are not cute. Cows and sheep are not cute (but we often feel guilty about eating their cute babies). That means that when a charity wants to protect an area, they use the fluffiest, most hapless animal they can find on the endangered list.

For absolute and categorical proof that cuteness is biological, we need to turn to Japan, the world’s first superpower of oddities, where kawaii (cuteness) culture has reigned unchallenged since Hello Kitty took her first faltering steps in 1974. In Japan, any megacompany worth its salt has a cute animal mascot. Just look at these pioneering cute toys. But it’s in cartoon culture that we see cuteness taken to the extreme. The girls of anime and manga are cute. Really cute. Small noses, vast limpid eyes, large heads. So it’s no wonder that Japan’s legions of male otaku geeks are besotted with them – often to the point where real girls just don’t match up. It’s hard to compete with a cartoon (take a look), but Japanese girls give it a red-hot crack, making their voices higher and adopting a variety of cuteification techniques such as expert giggling and dressing like schoolgirls.

Of course, babies get less cute as they get older. Their bodies grow in proportion to their heads. Their eyes seem less huge. They gain co-ordination. But by then, evolution’s work is done. It’s a trick – but it’s a good one.

(Photo: Shutterstock)


Who knew...

15th August, 2012 @ 01:45 am PDT

I used to be cute...sigh.

15th August, 2012 @ 06:55 am PDT

All together: Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...

Shawn H Corey
15th August, 2012 @ 08:03 am PDT

Puppies, kittens: cute. baby lizards and turtles: very cute! Human babies, really damn ugly! And once they start crying, no way in the world I even want to stay in the same room, much less want to pick up or hold them. Yuck.

Glen Jacobsen
15th August, 2012 @ 09:16 am PDT

@Glen: clearly, brother, you are not a dad.

Clay Jones
15th August, 2012 @ 12:40 pm PDT

Well it was sorta... obvious.

..as opposed to surprising.

Peter Green
16th August, 2012 @ 02:00 am PDT

Its true enough, but the science and the understanding of these principles is really well established, quite old and the article represents nothing new, which just makes me ask, why?

Gavin Greaves
16th August, 2012 @ 03:04 pm PDT

I'm with Glen. Must have missed the "find babies cute" gene.

Chris D Hooley
16th August, 2012 @ 05:12 pm PDT

Had thought up all this myself before reading this.. anyway good to know that its true :D

Abby Joseph George
23rd August, 2012 @ 10:50 pm PDT

"For absolute and categorical proof that cuteness is biological, "

Where is the evidence?

18th April, 2013 @ 09:09 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 31,683 articles