Purchasing new hardware? Read our latest product comparisons

Tin-based stanene could conduct electricity with 100 percent efficiency


December 1, 2013

As a one-atom thick topological insulator, stanene could conduct electricity at full efficiency at room temperatures (Image: Yong Xu/Tsinghua University; Greg Stewart/SLAC)

As a one-atom thick topological insulator, stanene could conduct electricity at full efficiency at room temperatures (Image: Yong Xu/Tsinghua University; Greg Stewart/SLAC)

Image Gallery (2 images)

A team of theoretical physicists from the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University is predicting that stanene, a single layer of tin atoms laid out in a two-dimensional structure, could conduct electricity with one hundred percent efficiency at room temperature. If the findings are confirmed they could pave the way for building computer chips that are faster, consume less power, and won't heat up nearly as much.

Stanene is an example of a topological insulator, a class of materials that conduct electricity only on their outside edges or surfaces. When topological insulators are just one atom thick, their edges conduct electricity with 100 percent efficiency, forcing electrons to move in defined lanes, without resistance.

The team responsible for this work, led by Stanford physics professor Shoucheng Zhang, has studied several other structures which were later confirmed to be topological insulators, but if stanene is all they claim it is, then it would be a significant discovery because it would be the first topological insulator that is able to function at room temperature.

What's more, according to the team, when fluorine atoms are added into the atomic structures, the material could conduct electricity with perfect efficiency at temperatures as high as 100° C (210° F).

As with graphene, the main challenge in manufacturing such a material and testing its properties lies in producing sheets that are only a single atom thick. But if scientists can get past this hurdle, then its applications could be very exciting.

According to Zhang, a stanene-fluorine layer could be used to manufacture the internal electrical wiring of a microprocessor. This should vastly decrease the power consumption and heat production of computer chips, with a performance that exceeds that of the already promising graphene.

"Eventually, we can imagine stanene being used for many more circuit structures, including replacing silicon in the hearts of transistors," Zhang said.

A paper detailing the work appears in a recent edition of the journal Physical Review Letters.

Source: SLAC/Stanford University

About the Author
Dario Borghino Dario studied software engineering at the Polytechnic University of Turin. When he isn't writing for Gizmag he is usually traveling the world on a whim, working on an AI-guided automated trading system, or chasing his dream to become the next European thumbwrestling champion. All articles by Dario Borghino

That will be huge if superconducting could be accomplished without liquid nitrogen.


How flexible is the stuff room temperature superconductor would be tremendously useful outside of computers but only if it is flexible enough to be handled like aluminum wire.


This is incredible... tin's about 3 times the cost of copper, but you'd only need a fraction of it. This could revolutionize motors, batteries and power transmission. No resistance = no heat or line losses. Color me skeptical of anything that claims "100% efficiency", but if it is, I suppose it is.

Maybe it's time to start dusting off those patents that required room temperature superconductors. An "electric jet" may not be such a crazy idea after all.

Ian Bruce

Slowburn: "How flexible is the stuff room temperature superconductor would be tremendously useful outside of computers but only if it is flexible enough to be handled like aluminum wire."

Some currently marketed superconductors which need cooling are made flexible by layering them on a conductive--but not superconductive--tape so flexibility may not be too big an issue. Capacity may be though.

I notice that they are not using the term "superconductor", possibly to be conservative in their announcement. It is certainly an interesting development if it is verified experimentally and may have uses even if it doesn't make it as a true superconductor (however that is defined). But they will need to learn to produce it cheaply, which could take some time, and what arrangement is best to maximize the effect.

Snake Oil Baron

You seem to assume that there will be no current limit. If I understand correctly, there is current limit at which current superconductors stop being superconductors. I see no reason why this wouldn't be a case here. Probably that is the reason why uses in chips are mentioned, not uses in power transmision.

Piotr Radziwoński

The article states that this substance only conducts electricity on its surface, but as it is only one atom thick, the surface is also the entire thickness of it. Atoms are three-dimensional, however small they are. Layers of the stuff could be stacked together, and would therefore appear to pass current through the entire thickness. Superconducting electric motors, here we come!

David Clarke

A sheet 1 atom thick probably has very little current capacity, hence the suggested applications in the article. I think layering sheets, which would presumably have to be seperated somehow, would be an even greater manufacturing challenge.

Chris Bonner

Cant imagine the type of smartphone you can have...

Francis Short

how about a spiral "tube" to increase current capacity? would such a spiral have to have an insulator between layers? tensile strength of the stanene? decades ago a prof. at WSU did research on melting basalt rock and drawing through a hole for insulation purposes, but it also turned out to have 7 times tensile strength of steel...not very flexible though. maybe good for suspension bridge cables? but for power transmission it could work.


I'm not sure that superconductors have any practical current limit - I recall seeing a superconducting coil thinner than a hair that could carry over 10,000 amps at Rutherford Appleton labs, and that was 30 years ago. Mind you, the uncooled, room-temperature end of the connections were bigger than me!

For internal on-chip wiring, no flexibility is required. You don't need high current either, but no resistance also means no heat generation, which could remove a massive obstacle to increasing CPU speeds. Off-chip connections have far less to gain by this since you can just use fat wires as space isn't an issue: your computer's speed is not limited in any practical way by the current carrying capacity of its internal cabling.

As far as manufacturing goes, they should probably be talking to the graphene people who have been trying to deal with the manufacturing side for some time.

Room-temperature superconductors have been around for decades too - the big breakthrough was really having them work well with liquid nitrogen, since that's dirt cheap compared to liquid helium. I've heard it said that cooling the whole energy grid with liquid nitrogen would have paid for itself in reducing heat loss many times over by now.


It would appear that they are talking about a lane down each edge of the stanene-fluorine ribbon that they are talking 1 atom wide as well as 1 atom thick. The current limit then would be a function of the number of free electrons available in that single atom lane. But it sounds like it is certainly enough current to conduct signals throughout a microprocessor. That is certainly good news.

As others have suggested multiple ribbons could certainly be run in parallel. I would also think you could reduce the number of non-conducting lanes in the middle to just enough to provide the required physical strength.

I thought electronics was fun back in about 1956 when I built a 5 tube super-heterodyne radio. But I never dreamed of anything like this.

Mr E

I see a big show-stopper: This stuff would have to be constructed, atom-by-atom, by pico-size super-mario bricklayers.


The cost of Evacuated Tube Transport Technology will be enormously reduced by this technology, making it even more economically inexpensive than ever before. New York to Beijing by land in two hours! I can hardly wait.

Robert Fallin

So there is zero heat. Zero loss, and the electrons don't drag any ions as they traverse the structure, it stays in perfect shape and never deforms.

This all sounds too good to be true which invariably means it isn't.

You know I may have a bridge some of you might be interested in buying if you believe all this.


@ Ian Bruce Unless you have a use other than powering an airplane the limit on an electric jet is the energy storage device. Both the energy density (weight and volume) and the Fact that they don't loose weight when the energy is expended.

@ Robert Fallin

The cost of Evacuated Tube Transport system that prevents them from being built is the cost of building the tunnel.


You could make extremely lightweight batteries with a super conducting wires by simply putting more and more power in the coil. The electric and magnetic fields will have to be dealt with when storing that kind of electricity though.

Post a Comment

Login with your Gizmag account:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our articles