Top 100: The most desirable cars of all time

SpaceX's Grasshopper VTVL takes a 40 meter hop

By

December 26, 2012

SpaceX's Grasshopper VTVL testbed ascending from its launch pad

SpaceX's Grasshopper VTVL testbed ascending from its launch pad

Image Gallery (2 images)

The SpaceX Grasshopper vertical takeoff vertical landing (VTVL) testbed has successfully flown to a height of 40 meters (131 ft), hovered for a bit and subsequently landed in a picture perfect test on December 17, 2012. The Grasshopper had previously taken two hops to less than 6 m (20 ft) in height, but the latest test was the first that saw it reach an altitude taller than the rocket itself, which is a modified Falcon 9 orbital launch vehicle. The flight lasted 29 seconds from launch to landing, and carried a 1.8 m (6 ft) cowboy dummy to give an indication of scale.

Despite their seeming inefficiency, vertical takeoff vertical landing (VTVL) rockets have long been a fixture in the world of space flight. The first manned VTVL spacecraft was the Apollo Lunar Lander, which landed on and took off from the Moon vertically, a task made far easier by the Moon's one-sixth gravity. This was followed in the 1990s by the McDonald-Douglass Delta Clipper, a one-third scale test model of a proposed single-stage-to-orbit launch rocket.

Since that time a handful of VTVL spacecraft have emerged from plans on paper to successful hardware. Most have been small, and the largest burst of activity was associated with the Northrop Grumman / NASA Lunar Lander Challenge in the latter half of the previous decade.

Several VTVL suborbital and orbital launchers are currently in various stages of (mostly early) development. The latest and largest of these is SpaceX's Grasshopper, which is built of the first stage tanks of a Falcon 9 launch rocket, a single Merlin-1D engine (the Falcon 9 uses nine such engines), and a supporting structure for four hydraulically damped steel landing legs. The Grasshopper stands 32.3 meters (106 ft) tall and is 3.66 meters (12.0 ft) in diameter, making it the largest VTVL craft ever flown.

Elon Musk added a 1.8 m (6 ft) tall mascot to the latest Grasshopper flight to add some pe...

Grasshopper is also distinguished from most other VTVL craft in that it is the testbed of a project to convert an active commercial orbital medium-lift (10,000 kg to low earth orbit) launch vehicle into a recoverable launch system. Prior VTVL craft (aside from the Lunar Lander) were intended to be research vehicles or one-off demonstrators.

Looking to the future, testing is expected to take up to three years, during which subsonic tests will be carried out at SpaceX's McGregor, Texas facility. An initial FAA permit for up to 70 suborbital launches per year will allow flights at altitudes up to 3,500 m (11,500 ft) with durations of up to nearly three minutes. SpaceX has already requested FAA approval to increase the altitude of some of the initial test flights. Supersonic flight tests are expected in due course, but no firm details have been announced.

CEO Elon Musk, speaking about the Grasshopper program, said in November 2012: "Over the next few months, we’ll gradually increase the altitude and speed ... I do think there probably will be some craters along the way; we’ll be very lucky if there are no craters. Vertical landing is an extremely important breakthrough – extreme, rapid reusability."

The successful December 17, 2012, test fight can be seen in the video below.

Source: Elon Musk via Twitter

About the Author
Brian Dodson From an early age Brian wanted to become a scientist. He did, earning a Ph.D. in physics and embarking on an R&D career which has recently broken the 40th anniversary. What he didn't expect was that along the way he would become a patent agent, a rocket scientist, a gourmet cook, a biotech entrepreneur, an opera tenor and a science writer.   All articles by Brian Dodson
Tags
10 Comments

Very well done, SpaceX!

mooseman
26th December, 2012 @ 03:59 pm PST

Congratulations Elon and SpaceX on a successful test flight.

I am looking forward to the day when this is repeated on Mars.

Stephen Colbourne
26th December, 2012 @ 07:20 pm PST

@ Stephen - I don't think you will see this setup land on Mars, ever.

Space X might get to Mars in 15-ish years, and I think they will. But it wont be landing a falcon 9 rocket on its surface. Elon is working on a Mars transport ship, that wont land on Mars, but will simply be a ferry, that will always to coming and going, from Earth to Mars. Once you get to Mars, you will likely use something not yet developed, but it will likely be the dragon 2.0 capsule, and it might have an additional rocket stage to help it land and takeoff.

Elon hasn't announced most of this yet, but he has given people juuuuust enough to give you a good idea of what he is working on. In 2013 he will give many more details.

Derek Howe
26th December, 2012 @ 10:02 pm PST

Impressive but I still think winged horizontal landing is the way to go.

Slowburn
27th December, 2012 @ 12:18 am PST

Awesome news!

DaveBG
27th December, 2012 @ 02:33 am PST

Brilliant to see the quality engineering that this company continues to produce. All power to them :o)

FrankR
27th December, 2012 @ 03:51 am PST

Very well done indeed! How much of that craft is fuel tank?

John Silvia
27th December, 2012 @ 07:24 am PST

All these will be outdated very soon, as Mr. Keshe's new science and technology for space travel come onto the scene. We are at the dawn of flying saucer technology now, yet so few realise it.

JC
28th December, 2012 @ 01:56 am PST

Very promising indeed, one day we'll have a reusable SSTO.

Chamitha Priyasankha
28th December, 2012 @ 11:25 pm PST

Reaction Engines SABRE combined air-breathing/rocket engine was successfully tested recently in the UK and it may well be that their Skylon spacecraft will be the cheapest way to LEO.

aidanruff
2nd January, 2013 @ 06:50 am PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,910 articles
Recent popular articles in Space
Product Comparisons