Top 100: The most desirable cars of all time

Space Fence Mark II - Prototype S-band radar tracks space junk smaller than an inch across


March 15, 2012

A prototype of the new Lockheed Martin Space Fence radar system is currently tracking orbi...

A prototype of the new Lockheed Martin Space Fence radar system is currently tracking orbiting space objects smaller than was ever possible - down to about a centimeter in size

Image Gallery (9 images)

A prototype of the new Lockheed Martin Space Fence radar system is currently tracking orbiting space objects smaller than was ever possible - down to about a centimeter in size. In doing so, it met a key contract requirement during a series of demonstration events by proving it could detect and track such small objects.

Intended to replace the Air Force Space Situational System (AFSSS), a ground-based 217 MHz megawatt-scale radar detector, the prototype for the new Space Fence is capable of tracking more than 200,000 centimeter-sized objects - ten times smaller than can be detected with the previous system. "Our final system design incorporates a scalable, solid-state S-band radar ... capable of detecting much smaller objects than the Air Force’s current system," said Steve Bruce, vice president of Lockheed Martin's Space Fence program.

But is this new Space Fence worth spending a projected US$3.5 billion? In 2009 a pair of satellites collided, releasing roughly the same amount of energy as a Davy Crockett nuclear device, resulting in total destruction and production of thousands of new bits of space junk. Many centimeter-sized holes have been punched through the shuttle's radiator, and nearly every shuttle mission resulted in needing to replace a chipped window or two. Most of these events cannot be predicted or avoided with earlier systems. The colliding debris is simply too small to be seen.

Space is full of junk. Space debris, orbital debris, space waste ... any object in orbit that has no useful purpose is junk, and we don't know where most of it is. The debris ranges from empty rocket casings, dead satellites, and the occasional tool box to the tiniest fragments of paint, glass, or metal. And space junk can be dangerous. With hundreds of thousands of objects in orbit, risk of potential collisions now threatens national space assets providing critical services, including the Global Positioning System, banking and telecommunications.

How big must a bit of debris be to present a significant danger? Currently we can track 10-cm objects. Assuming an impact velocity of 6 miles per second, a 10-cm object strikes with the power of about 20 kg of TNT. Under the same assumptions, a 1-cm object is equal to a 40-mm HE grenade. Even a BB delivers 5 times the energy of a .44 magnum. A tiny paint chip can also be destructive - well over 100 shuttle windows were replaced owing to chips from the impact of tiny objects.

12mm crater on Shuttle windshield from impact of a 200 micron white paint chip (Photo: NAS...
12mm crater on Shuttle windshield from impact of a 200 micron white paint chip (Photo: NASA)

When a major collision occurs, sizable debris clouds form and spread from the collision site. These debris clouds eventually spread out to fill a shell around the Earth. As the density of space junk increases, there will be more and more collisions, generating more space junk and still more collisions. The odds of collision depend on the number of objects in space, so there is a critical density where the creation of new debris occurs faster than the various natural forces remove these objects from orbit. Beyond this point a runaway chain reaction can occur that reduces all objects in orbit to debris in a period of years or months. This possibility is known as the Kessler Syndrome.

By combining better tracking of space junk by the Space Fence with improved maneuverability of satellites and the active prevention of a few particularly messy collisions, we hope to avoid a Kessler Syndrome, and maintain near-Earth space as a base for practical applications and as a staging area for more distant exploration.

There's a video with more information on the Space Fence below.

Source: Lockheed Martin

About the Author
Brian Dodson From an early age Brian wanted to become a scientist. He did, earning a Ph.D. in physics and embarking on an R&D career which has recently broken the 40th anniversary. What he didn't expect was that along the way he would become a patent agent, a rocket scientist, a gourmet cook, a biotech entrepreneur, an opera tenor and a science writer.   All articles by Brian Dodson

That degree of tracking accuracy, on such small objects, in such high numbers, in such a vast volume, is amazing...

All that oxygen and fuel getting things up and into orbital velocity makes for some very fast moving objects....

All that energy in one little object, dissipating in millionths of a second when it goes "POW" into something else.......


Mr Stiffy
15th March, 2012 @ 06:03 pm PDT

Tracking the stuff is good. Now if we orbited a satellite with a powerful electromagnet that could be activated any time a piece of electrically conductive junk crossed its orbit in a manner that would allow for the sharing of energy to slow the junk down.

15th March, 2012 @ 07:39 pm PDT

Now if only someone would generate a suitable forcefield shield, and all those psinning screws, bolts and paint would not be a problem anyway.

Wonder how long it will be before we can vaporise the debris. Perhaps not a good idea, if we start blowing stuff into smaller pieces - becomes likes the old asteroid game with faster smaller moving pieces and boom --- missed one.

16th March, 2012 @ 09:27 am PDT

It's too bad you can't put out a massive electromagnetic net to capture all of this junk. Not only would it make the spaceways safer, but it could be melted down at a facility in orbit (that would grow as it collected more metal to build itself) so the existing junk could be used to make ships, etc. without the added expense of having to launch more raw materials into space or build on Earth and launch a finished product. The "raw" materials are already up there if we could capture them and re-process them up there.

Dave Andrews
16th March, 2012 @ 10:03 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,911 articles
Recent popular articles in Space
Product Comparisons