Decision time? Read Gizmag's latest product comparisons

Snake’s rectilinear locomotion inspires more efficient all-terrain robot design

By

January 19, 2012

Scalybot 2 replicates the rectilinear locomotion employed by snakes that is efficient and ...

Scalybot 2 replicates the rectilinear locomotion employed by snakes that is efficient and allows them to crawl into tight spaces

While you might think its lack of limbs might limit how it gets around, snakes have actually developed several different forms of locomotion. One of these is "rectilinear locomotion," and while most snakes are capable of it, it is most commonly associated with large pythons and boas. Although it is the slowest form of snake locomotion, it is also very efficient and allows the snakes to crawl into tight spaces. It is these latter two qualities that appealed to Georgia Tech researchers when developing a new all-terrain robot called Scalybot 2.

While most modes of snake locomotion involve the snake bending its body laterally, rectilinear locomotion is the only one in which the snake doesn't have to bend its body at all - except when turning. The snake lifts the scales on its belly and is pulled forward by a muscular wave that travels from the head to the tail. The snakes are also able to alter the angle of their scales to reduce or increase the amount of friction depending on the slope and terrain over which they are moving.

While at first glance two-link Scalybot 2 doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a snake, it replicates their rectilinear locomotion and can automatically change the angle of its "scales" depending on the surface terrain or slope. Hamid Marvi, a Mechanical Engineering Ph.D. candidate at Georgia Tech, studied and videotaped the movements of 20 different species of snake when developing Scalybot 2. Marvi's robot is controlled by a remote-controlled joystick and can move forward and backwards using four motors.

"By using their scales to control frictional properties, snakes are able to move large distances while exerting very little energy," says Marvi, who unveiled the robot earlier this month at the Society for Integrative & Comparative Biology (SICB) annual meeting in Charleston, South Carolina. "Rectilinear locomotion is very efficient and is especially useful for crawling within crevices, an invaluable benefit for search-and-rescue robots."

Marvi designed Scalybot 2 in the lab of his advisor, David Hu, an assistant professor in Georgia Tech's Schools of Mechanical Engineering and Biology. Last summer, Hu and his research team used another form of snake locomotion, concertina locomotion, to develop Scalybot 1 - a two-link robot that uses the push-and-pull, accordion-style movement that is much less efficient than rectilinear locomotion.

Snakes have proven a rich source of inspiration in the field of robot design with the climbing HyDRAS robot, the continuous track-heavy OmniTread and pipe-inspecting robot design from SINTEF just a few examples.

"Snakes are highly maligned creatures," said Joe Mendelson, curator of herpetology at Zoo Atlanta where Marvi studied the movement of snakes. "I really like that Hamid's research is showing the public that snakes can help people."

Here's a video showing Scalybot 2 in action.

About the Author
Darren Quick Darren's love of technology started in primary school with a Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong (still functioning) and a Commodore VIC 20 computer (not still functioning). In high school he upgraded to a 286 PC, and he's been following Moore's law ever since. This love of technology continued through a number of university courses and crappy jobs until 2008, when his interests found a home at Gizmag.   All articles by Darren Quick
Tags
3 Comments

How is this efficient? You're wasting energy lifting the body and 50% of the motion is lost resetting for the next movement. Let's not forget there is a huge loss of momentum.

Thomas Roberts
20th January, 2012 @ 09:04 am PST

The embodied energy to execute a movement goes up with the cube of velocity. Also, the scale as a lever arm is very short, so the bending moment involved with extending a group of scales is very low. Also, the snake is preferentially using slow-twitch muscle fibers, which are more efficient than fast-twitch fibers, which are probably focused on the actual act of grabbing and wrapping, preparatory to the longer process of suffocating, and then breaking the bones, which are endurance feats which I would expect would rely on slow-twitch fibers, once the fast-twitch ones have used up their energy stores.

Mark Roest
20th January, 2012 @ 05:02 pm PST

Oh good, another search and rescue robot to help with people trapped in the dozens of collapsed buildings and mine shafts that we have to deal with every single day.

Seriously, why can't these guys just say "we don't really know why we are building this, but we thought it would be interesting".

Michaelc
21st January, 2012 @ 06:09 am PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,719 articles