Science

Sapphire fibers carry 40 times more electricity than copper wire

Sapphire fibers carry 40 times more electricity than copper wire
Newly-developed superconductive sapphire wires are reportedly about to carry 40 times more electricity than traditional copper wiring (pictured)(Photo: Stefan Riepel)
Newly-developed superconductive sapphire wires are reportedly about to carry 40 times more electricity than traditional copper wiring (pictured)
(Photo: Stefan Riepel)
View 1 Image
Newly-developed superconductive sapphire wires are reportedly about to carry 40 times more electricity than traditional copper wiring (pictured)(Photo: Stefan Riepel)
1/1
Newly-developed superconductive sapphire wires are reportedly about to carry 40 times more electricity than traditional copper wiring (pictured)
(Photo: Stefan Riepel)

One of the limitations of traditional copper electrical wiring is the fact that the metal's resistance causes the wire to heat up, and some of the energy being carried through the wire is lost in the form of that heat. Wires made from superconducting materials, however, would have no resistance, so could transfer much more energy. While previous attempts at the technology have proven too fragile or expensive, researchers from Tel Aviv University have now developed a new type of cost-effective superconductive wire, that they claim can carry 40 times more electricity than copper wiring of the same size.

Earlier efforts at superconductive energy transfer have involved coating crystal wafers and magnetic tapes with superconductors, but were respectively too brittle and too expensive.

The Tel Aviv team instead created wires made from single-crystal sapphire fibers, which were then coated in a ceramic mixture. Each wire is slightly thicker than a human hair, and although they can transfer large amounts of electricity, they must be continuously cooled in order to remain in a superconducting state. That duty is handled by a self-contained cooling system, that uses inexpensive liquid nitrogen.

Dr. Boaz Almog, one of the scientists who developed the superconductive wires, believes that they would be ideal for delivering energy from remote renewable energy sources, or for deploying electricity throughout municipal grids.

14 comments
14 comments
drakesword
If your saving efficiency in current transfer how much are you using to produce and pump the liquid nitrogen ...
Mr Stiffy
Hmmmm the capital cost // efficiency // overheads - running a comparative amount of power over say 1000Km.
Some numbers up front please?
Muraculous
Why do you need wires to transmit commercial electricity when you could simply deliver a massive capacitor full every few seconds via a vectored arc (sorry Mr. Tesla, you were close). Repeaters when and where necessary.
Robert Volk
Well- it\'s a nice idea, theoretically. But you aren\'t going to change infrastructures with any wires that must be cooled by any gases- cost would be astronomical.
No mention if the electrons act the same way they do in a real copper wire (ie: is current still conveyed for motors/electromagnetic use?), or is simply for transporting electrical energy from one spot to another?
Charles Bosse
Drakesword: since several wires can be cooled at once, the cooling/volt could be pretty favorable. Of course, the huge problem with these lines is their performance in disasters: that much power would likely cause explosions if the line broke.
Slowburn
Given that superconductors do not produce heat when current is passing through them, and insulation is cheap, the cost of generating the cryogenic nitrogen is significantly less than than the cost of the line loss of even copper transmission lines.
rollzone
hello. are you growing these sapphire crystals? is that what makes this attractive over the abundance of copper? in what way does this compare to encasing copper in ceramic and liquid nitrogen? perhaps such tremendous wastes of time and money will lead to the next step.
Slowburn
Re; rollzone
To get copper to superconduct you have to cool far beyond liquid nitrogen. The colder you go the more it costs. Additionally there is a limit to how much energy can be carries by a superconductor before it stops superconducting even when supercooled the sapphire might be better.
Gerard René Supersad
Hmmm.... sapphire, ultrastrong, relatively cheap. Liquid nitrogen ? solar driven stirling low vacuum refrigeration compressor/ evaporators systems in a line drop xfmr - xfmr system? The cooling\'s more esoteric than the sapphire Sconductors. It would be sensible to use this tech for substation transformers, but again...Liquid Nitrogen!
ralph.dratman
I had thought that high-temperature superconductors that only needed liquid N2 cooling were still very exotic and not ready for industrial use. Only having to go as low as liquid N2 is, according to my understanding, a big breakthrough. Previously it was all about liquid helium, I think, which really is way too cold to be practical.
Don\'t forget that the air is about 70% nitrogen, so the stuff is everywhere, just waiting to be separated, cooled down and used. I\'m guessing the money to be saved by even a small decrease in ohmic losses on a power line would more than pay for the energy, equipment and maintenance needed to liquify the nitrogen to do the cooling.
Load More