Decision time? Check out our latest product comparisons

Poppy, a 3D-printed humanoid robot that defies conventions

By

October 22, 2013

The assembled Poppy robot (Photo: Inria / H. Raguet)

The assembled Poppy robot (Photo: Inria / H. Raguet)

Image Gallery (10 images)

A new 3D-printed robot called Poppy is helping a team of French researchers study bipedal walking and human-robot interaction. They were able to design, fabricate, and assemble a relatively large robot for around €8,000 (US$11,000) including servo motors and electronics. That's about a third the cost of commercial robots in the same size category like the RQ-TITAN, and is still cheaper than smaller humanoids like the Aldebaran Robotics NAO. And best of all, they plan to make their design open source.

One of the ways they managed to keep the cost down is by using lightweight materials, which means the robot requires less powerful (and cheaper) servo motors. Standing 84 cm (33 in) tall, Poppy weighs in at just 3.5 kg (7.7 lb). The Sony QRIO, by comparison, was 26 cm (10 in) shorter yet it weighed twice as much. Still, most of the cost lies in the robot's 25 servo motors: it utilizes 21 high-end Robotis Dynamixel MX-28s, two MX-64s, and two AX-12s. It's powered by a Raspberry Pi, and is equipped with 16 force-sensing resistors, two HD cameras, a stereo microphone, and an inertial measurement unit. Poppy's "face" is an LCD screen which can be used to show emotions (or to debug).

Making a more human robot

One of the main reasons the INRIA Flowers (FLOWing Epigenetic Robots and Systems) team opted to build its own robot is because none of the available commercial kits are truly biologically inspired. By rapidly-prototyping their own robot, Poppy could challenge some of the usual robot design conventions.

To begin with, it has an articulated spine with five motors – almost unheard of in robots of this size, but one of the ongoing topics at INRIA Flowers since its first humanoid, ACROBAN, from several years ago. The spine not only allows Poppy to move more naturally, but helps to balance the robot by adjusting its posture. The added flexibility also helps when physically interacting with the robot, such as guiding it by its hands, which is currently required to help the robot walk.

Looking at the knees, you'll see some springs spanning the upper and lower leg joints. The tension in the springs helps to keep the supporting leg straight during each step without motorization. And farther down, its feet are smaller than most robots of Poppy's size, and its toes are thin, allowing them to bend. Rather than planting each foot parallel to the ground, which is how most robots this size walk, the toes help the robot achieve "heel to toe" walking. And as for those children's shoes Poppy wears? They're equipped with five pressure sensors on each sole, which provide useful data.

One of the more obvious deviations in design can be seen in its upper legs, which bend inwards at an angle of six degrees. Despite the fact that this more closely models the human femur, most humanoid robot designs have opted for straight leg linkages. By bending the thighs in, the distance between the two feet is shortened, moving the supporting leg's foot closer to the robot's center of gravity. And that makes it more stable when standing on one leg and when walking.

Here you can see the dramatic difference in lateral movement between the Poppy with bent t...
Here you can see the dramatic difference in lateral movement between the Poppy with bent thighs (left) and straight thighs (right) (Photo: Inria / H. Raguet)

The INRIA team produced two versions of Poppy: one with straight thighs and another with the bent ones. Experiments showed that the robot with bent thighs swayed far less during its walking gait, making it much more stable. However, the robot still can't balance on its own, so for now it needs a human trainer.

In the future, the team hopes to get Poppy walking on its own, and plans to share its designs with other labs to promote more biologically-inspired humanoid robot designs.

You can see Poppy in the following video.

Sources: INRIA Flowers, Poppy Project via 3ders

About the Author
Jason Falconer Jason is a freelance writer based in central Canada with a background in computer graphics. He has written about hundreds of humanoid robots on his website Plastic Pals and is an avid gamer with an unsightly collection of retro consoles, cartridges, and controllers.   All articles by Jason Falconer
Tags
7 Comments

Clever! I wonder if the team have considered using model drone/helicopter sensors and gyroscopic control along with the present spine system to keep the little chap upright? Some of the chips released recently are down to the size of a camera storage card. Sensing "sway" and adjusting posture would be almost automatic.

The Skud
22nd October, 2013 @ 06:46 pm PDT

@Skud I believe that's what the inertial measurement unit will be used for, they just haven't implemented the control algorithm for it yet.

Robotbling
22nd October, 2013 @ 10:14 pm PDT

I am by no means an expert at all, but my spontaneous reaction is: A Robot with a cable? C'mon, you gotta be kidding. Anybody else?

Thomas Bollinger
23rd October, 2013 @ 02:42 am PDT

@Thomas Bollinger This is standard for prototype robots, and is because, (i guess - no expert), they haven't implemented a battery yet :)

Manke
23rd October, 2013 @ 03:30 am PDT

"Poppy, a 3D-printed humanoid robot..."

This is simply not a true statement. Poppy is *not* a 3D-printed robot.

The plastic parts are certainly 3D printed. The motors, wires, cables, control circuits, metal bits and pieces are bought from traditional manufacturers. In other words, 95% of the complexity. The 3D printing is presently confined to the plastic bits. Still useful, but let's not violate the basic facts with headlines so poorly worded that they're false.

Anyone with any understanding of modern technology already knows this, but the utterly naive amongst us seem to actually believe that the robot exits the 3D printer fully assembled. Seriously.

Anonymous756
23rd October, 2013 @ 05:30 am PDT

Interesting. As an inducement or alternative to parenting, it wins the cute vote, the 'helplessness' of aided walking and the like makes it clear that this is a child simulant, even before the scaling and big-eye open featured 'look'.

That said, the achievement of reduced weight comes at a penalty in structural effects design as you are essentially looking at a truss system which is going to constrain several design freedoms as both volumetric efficiencies in mounting larger or alternate actuators within the box, thrust as load lines for linearizing stress and keeping total displacement low. And of course the installation of higher kinematic pairings as sculpted joint pairs rather than simple revolute/cylindrical etc. systems.

In this we don't want to fight weight through miniaturization. We want to design system volumes by expected loads. A labor robot that can carry a 25lb load or 150lbs in combination with other robots for instance has to be designed around expected torque differentials that go beyond natural balance.

It's such a shame that we assume 'education, art and experimental' designs have to be functionally isolated from developmental approaches which yield practical applications.

Hit Or Miss
23rd October, 2013 @ 09:11 pm PDT

I am not sure what the extra back-bone flexibility provides over one forward-backward and a side-to-side swivel, other than appearing more natural.

However, the bending toes is good. My own latest design using springs to push-back on the toes.

One aspect missed, as per the gait, is the ability to wiggle the butt. Try sitting it on a chair, from the side. This also makes the gait look less natural when walking. To solve this problem, you could change the pelvis such that each side swivels forward and backward on the extremity. For example walking, the right hip swivels forward as the left hip swivel backward--this keeps the body facing forward straight as it walks forward.

Every humanoid design I've seen misses this ability.. although 3D animators tend to be familiar with the need.

Matthew C. Tedder
9th December, 2013 @ 09:32 pm PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,039 articles