Highlights from the 2014 LA Auto Show

Added DNA could be used to authenticate premium olive oil

By

April 25, 2014

Olive oil counterfeiters may be thwarted by DNA particles, that are mixed into the liquid ...

Olive oil counterfeiters may be thwarted by DNA particles, that are mixed into the liquid (Photo: Shutterstock)

When most people think of counterfeit goods, they probably picture things like handbags or watches. In fact, there's also a huge market for knock-off high-end food products, such as extra-virgin olive oil. Scientists from Switzerland's ETH Zurich research group, however, have come up with a possible method of thwarting the makers of that bogus oil – just add synthetic DNA particles to the real thing. And yes, consumers would proceed to swallow those particles.

Because DNA can be damaged by exposure to chemicals, light, and fluctuations in temperature when outside of a living organism, the particles are first encased in a protective silica coating. Iron oxide nanoparticles are also added, which come into the picture later.

The DNA particles can then be added to olive oil, with quite a small amount of them being sufficient for the task at hand – according to ETH, "Just a few grams of the new substance are enough to tag the entire olive oil production of Italy."

When stores subsequently wanted to verify the authenticity of tagged oil, they could use a magnet to retrieve some of the DNA particles from a sample of the liquid. This is where the attached iron oxide comes in, as it's drawn to magnets.

The DNA is then freed from its silica shell using a fluoride-based solution, and analyzed via an inexpensive process known as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). If the code of the sampled DNA matched the code that was recorded when the DNA was added by the manufacturer, then the oil would be the genuine article.

Although it would be extremely difficult for counterfeiters to create DNA with that same code, they might be tempted to instead just add a bit of the authentic tagged oil to their own product, thereby mixing in some of its DNA. That wouldn't work, either, however, as it's also possible to measure the concentration of DNA particles in a sample – again, that amount would have to match the value that was recorded by the original manufacturer.

The particles reportedly don't alter the appearance or taste of the oil, and are said to be harmless to ingest. Silica and iron oxide are essentially sand and rust, and are already present in some commonly-consumed foods. As for DNA, we eat it every time we eat plant or animal products. That said, lead scientist Robert Grass thinks that the technology might go over better with consumers if the synthetic DNA were replaced with natural DNA, such as that of fruits or vegetables.

Application of the DNA particles would reportedly cost about 0.02 cents per liter of oil. The tagging system could also be used on a wide variety of other liquids, and has already been successfully tested on Bergamot essential oil, which is used in perfumes. Scientists at Portugal's University of Aveiro are working on a similar system, in which DNA "barcodes" can be added to both liquids and dry goods.

A paper on the ETH research was recently published in the journal ACS Nano.

Source: ETH Zurich

About the Author
Ben Coxworth An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away.   All articles by Ben Coxworth
4 Comments

I got a hint for these folks: they're 10 years too late.

All these "tagging" schemes seem to forget one thing: if they're cheap to manufacture in the first place, they're cheap to copy.

Today, you can get a used PCR machine on Ebay for under $200. Take a few of those DNA fragments, and replicate away.

If there are serious olive oil counterfeiters out there, this might stop them for about a week. Just my guess.

Anne Ominous
25th April, 2014 @ 06:28 pm PDT

I agree with Anne Ominous. This technology seems very easy to copy and is therefore pointless. The fact that "synthetic DNA" is used makes it even worse. It *might* be harmless but you can guarantee that the perception would be that it isn't (and perception is what matters in the marketplace).

Back to the drawing board.

mooseman
26th April, 2014 @ 12:54 am PDT

Also - what is there to stop counterfeiters labelling their oil as "added DNA free" by using big magnets in a flow-through system to remove the identifying ones?

Hijacked or stolen olive oil is cheap!

The Skud
27th April, 2014 @ 09:52 pm PDT

In agreement with the comments above and I wil add something one other disheartening bit of information:

It isn't "counterfeiters" but, sadly, the major brands (such as Bertolli's) who are doing this. A great deal of "100% Extra Virgin" olive oil is not, in fact, "100%".

As someone who is invested in a smal greek olive oil company, I learned this with dismay. Something like 70% of the most popular "100% extra virgin ollive oil" brands are blended - and not with olive oil but canola, vegetable, sunflower and/or soybean oils to name a few.

Italy has confiscated farms, Australia offers voluntary certification (to date, no one has passed), and the list goes on.

Joseph Boe
29th April, 2014 @ 11:03 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,539 articles
Recent popular articles in Science
Comparison Reviews