Introducing the Gizmag Store

Edible dispersant could provide more eco-friendly way to fight oil spills

By

August 23, 2012

The dispersants used to control the Deep Horizon oil spill were criticized for their toxic...

The dispersants used to control the Deep Horizon oil spill were criticized for their toxicity (Image: NASA)

Some people believe that there’s no problem that peanut butter, chocolate and whipped cream can’t solve. These people could be onto something with news that a team of researchers has developed a new, safer oil dispersant that uses edible ingredients found in the aforementioned trio of treats. The new dispersant could save the lives of thousands of birds and animals caught in environmental catastrophes.

Oil spills are bad news. They can cause untold environmental damage and cleanup costs can run into the tens of billions of dollars. But sometimes the cure can be almost as bad as the disease. The harm caused by oil spills such as the Exxon Valdez disaster or the Deep Horizon blowout isn’t just due to the spilled oil. The chemicals used to contain and remove the oil, called dispersants, are often very toxic and can do their own damage, so their use is often a trade off between two evils. This is particularly the case when hundreds of thousands of gallons of them are used.

Dispersants work on the same principle as detergents. Detergent molecules work by one end of the molecule being hydrophilic or water loving and the other end hydrophobic or water fearing. The hydrophobic end tries to get away from the water molecules while the hydrophilic end tries to go toward them. Because of these conflicting reactions, the hydrophobic end penetrates into any dirt or, preferably, oil in the vicinity while the hydrophilic end is drawn toward the water. This causes the dirt particles to break up and float away in little bubbles of detergent.

A dispersant works in a similar way, though with a number of other ingredients to help the process. An oil slick treated with detergent will break apart into globules that form an emulsion like a brown, nasty mayonnaise. It looks very unpleasant, but by breaking the slick apart, the oil becomes easier to control and dispose of. The problem is that many dispersants are themselves toxic and very harmful to any birds and animals that ingest them. Worse, dispersants can remove the natural oils on a bird or animal’s hair or feathers. This not only makes them more susceptible to cold and death by hypothermia, but they are more vulnerable to having oil redeposited on them, leaving them worse off than before.

The new dispersant was developed by a team led by Lisa K. Kemp and Robert Lochhead from the University of Southern Mississippi, which built on work done in developing home detergents and used of a robotic system to test thousands of variations.

Though it’s exact composition has not been divulged, Kemp says it is made from ingredients "used in common food products like peanut butter, chocolate and whipped cream," that can be ingested by birds and animals. It uses a uses a special polymer used in washing detergent to keep dirt from settling back on clothes, which also keeps oil from redepositing as well. And because the ingredients are common, large quantities can be manufactured quickly. The dispersant has passed out of the prototype stage and is currently awaiting field testing on actual oil spills.

The researchers presented a report on the new dispersant this week at the 244th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society.

Source: American Chemical Society

About the Author
David Szondy David Szondy is a freelance writer based in Monroe, Washington. An award-winning playwright, he has contributed to Charged and iQ magazine and is the author of the website Tales of Future Past.   All articles by David Szondy
Tags
2 Comments

I do not believe that breaking the oil slick up helps clean it up. Separating oil and water is not that difficult and does it really matter if the slick you are working on is 5 square miles 500 square miles. Suck the oil off the top getting as little water as practical (better more water and less time) use centrifugal separators to efficiently remove about 97% of the oil from the water and store it in tanks for eventual disposal. In the beginning of the cleanup the water and remaining oil can be discharged under the oil slick letting nature separate out the remaining oil and return it to the slick. When the slick has been reduced in size to the point that the remaining oil will not return itself to the slick you then take the water and run it through a filter that is made of a hydrophobic yet oil-philic (repels water attracts oil) material. (barbershop sweepings work well) when you have removed enough oil to meet the appropriate requirements (The law, the paymasters, your own satisfaction whichever is highest) you are done.

Pikeman
24th August, 2012 @ 12:33 am PDT

Well put Pikeman!

Looking back the clean up of Prince William Sound did more long term damage environmentally speaking than letting nature take its course.

Mechanical separation as far as is possible then use other methods. After separation and collection the oil can be "disposed" at refineries.

Let's try to avoid the law of unintended consequences as much as possible.

Dr. Veritas
24th August, 2012 @ 09:54 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles

Just enter your friends and your email address into the form below

For multiple addresses, separate each with a comma




Privacy is safe with us because we have a strict privacy policy.

Looking for something? Search our 26,455 articles