Decision time? Check out our latest product comparisons

Octopus inspires silent propulsion system for boats and subs

By

July 2, 2013

Fraunhofer's prototype propulsion system

Fraunhofer's prototype propulsion system

Image Gallery (2 images)

Along with their writhing tentacles, octopi and squid sport another interesting feature – they swim not by swishing a tail, but by expelling a jet of water. This allows them to move very quickly and quietly. Scientists from Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation have now copied this system, in a propulsion system that could ultimately find use in boats, recreational watercraft, or submarines.

Known as the Octopus Siphon Actuator, the miniature prototype system consists of four joined 20 x 6-cm (7.9 x 2.4-in) elastomer balls, each with a hydraulic piston inside. Initially, water is sucked in through an opening in each ball – just as a squid or octopus draws water into its mantle. Cables integrated into the balls then cause them to contract, rapidly expelling the water.

In the same way that the animals steer themselves by moving the funnel that the water comes out of, the Fraunhofer system can also be steered, using a motor to selectively point the balls in the desired direction(s).

The miniature prototype system consists of four joined 20 x 6-cm (7.9 x 2.4-in) elastomer ...

The whole apparatus can be fabricated in one step, using a 3D printer. Production could reportedly be scaled up to the point of producing balls measuring two meters (6.6 ft) across. According to Fraunhofer, not only would a commercial version of the technology allow for fast and near-silent travel, but there would also be no danger of sea creatures being cut by propellers.

Interestingly enough, the German researchers aren’t the only people currently developing such systems. As part of the recent Google Science Fair, Texas teen Alex Spiride recently showed off his own bio-inspired Squid-Jet underwater vehicle.

Sources: Fraunhofer, Hack a Day

About the Author
Ben Coxworth An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away.   All articles by Ben Coxworth
Tags
12 Comments

Squid (squirt) power

Ricky Hall
2nd July, 2013 @ 09:22 pm PDT

this was part of the early thought process behind the development of the water jet engine, (jet skis, etc.) if I recall. Unfortunately, this will not develop sufficient power for planing boats. But if you want silent, slow cruising in sufficiently deep water - not the normal 3 attributes for recreational boating, have at it

Dekarate
3rd July, 2013 @ 01:55 am PDT

And what exactly is the advantage of a silent propulsion, other than allowing ballistic submarines not to be detected, and thus being able to start World War 3? Also, those marine life that have been able to survive because they could hear us coming now will be able to be killed.

Nelson
3rd July, 2013 @ 09:57 am PDT

re; Nelson

Boomers are a retaliation platform. An ICBM first strike will be carried out by ground based missiles. Keeping the boomers hidden helps keep the peace.

Years ago a whale was hit by a hydrofoil one of the noisiest boats imaginable. The postmortem on the whale showed that it was stone deaf on the critical frequencies from too much exposure to load noises. Also when you are surrounded by load noise makers all making similar noises Identifying the one that is closing in on you is difficult. In the long run quieter boats would be easier to hear.

Slowburn
3rd July, 2013 @ 01:40 pm PDT

Efficiency is much greater.

Volodya Kotsev
3rd July, 2013 @ 01:51 pm PDT

Imagine a sub built non-metalic using this silent running. It could smuggle merchandise undetected.

Don Duncan
3rd July, 2013 @ 07:34 pm PDT

Whales and dolphins have been shown to suffer greatly from the noise of traditional prop systems. Silent or near silent ships will at least reduce this.

Mind you I don't believe it is likely to be adopted commercially unless it can be demonstrated to be efficient as well.

Ian McIntosh
3rd July, 2013 @ 10:01 pm PDT

Don Duncan, Shhhh!

Denis Klanac
4th July, 2013 @ 07:21 am PDT

hows this compare to estd waterjet propulsion now used??

See no difference save the Navy funding for Sub & ship use alone

Stephen N Russell
4th July, 2013 @ 07:47 am PDT

For biomimetic propulsion, I would prefer fishtail technology. Just as quiet, just as safe for wildlife and theoretically can scale up to much faster speeds. After all, the sailfish can exceed 60 mph and a slew of other species would leave the fastest submarines in the dust.

Gadgeteer
4th July, 2013 @ 04:35 pm PDT

I think it would be easier and about as quiet to use a large piston pump.

Slowburn
4th July, 2013 @ 06:00 pm PDT

I can't see this scaling up to any useful size. What is the cycle time? "Engage drive" Suuuuck, PUMP, (long pause) Suuuck, PUMP (repeat, repeat, repeat)- You would need a hull covered with the things with overlapping cycles to get any decent propulsion, especially against any sort of current.

The Skud
7th July, 2013 @ 09:19 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,990 articles