New High-Density Reactive Material increases weapons explosive force


January 3, 2012

A test of a U.S. Harpoon anti-shipping missile (Photo: Jason C. Winn)

A test of a U.S. Harpoon anti-shipping missile (Photo: Jason C. Winn)

On December 2, 2011, U.S. Military, government and industry officials witnessed a demonstration of a new missile warhead casing material at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Dahlgren, Virginia. The material, known as High-Density Reactive Material (HDRM), is the result of collaboration between the Office of Naval Research (ONR), NSWC Dahlgren and NSWC Indian Head Divisioncan and can be employed within existing designs, but with added destructive power.

When a steel casing is employed, kinetic energy is dissipated through the target on impact. HDRM will also dissipate kinetic energy but the material disintegrates within the target with an additional release of chemical energy. That is, damage is caused to the target not only by a high speed collision with dense material, but by a release of further energy as the material reacts.

Dr. Jason Jouet of the NSWC Indian Head Division stated, "with the strength of aluminum, density of steel, and more than one and a half times the energy of TNT, HDRM is truly a revolutionary enabling technology."

It should be noted that the comparison of the material's strength with aluminum here is likely in reference to strength per weight, not volume which is significant considering the material offers the same density as steel. Likewise the comparison with TNT refers to the energy released as the material reacts in a high-speed impact.


The implication of the technology is that a given target can be destroyed more easily as the material increases the probability of what is termed a "catastrophic kill." As Dr. Jouet states, "this approach may translate to less ordnance and ultimately fewer sorties to get the same result."

It should also be noted that the material will not explode unless involved in a high energy collision, which presents an obvious safety advantage over chemical explosives. Also, as fragments of the casing material explode on impact, there is likely to be less collateral damage effects as compared with the use of existing materials.

According to the BBC, HDRM is a combination of metals, polymers and oxidizers. The only apparent disadvantage of HDRM in comparison to existing materials appears to be its cost, with HDRM being some three to four times as expensive. HDRM may also have implications for improved interception of hostile missiles. With time, the material may be used not only for missile warheads but for large caliber small arms rounds and other similar applications.

Source: Naval Sea Systems Command


Doing what humans do best -- blowing stuff up....


So this stuff inside some kind of steel sabot + the rail-gun under development at USN and we would be back to the days of gunboats. How high energy is \'high energy\' with regards to detonation, I wonder?

Alan Belardinelli

kill, kill, wait why,oh money, religion, money, money religion, money, money, profits, money, money, money, shareholder money, profits, money,shareholders... WAR ROCKS! NOT discusting

Bill Bennett

re; Bill Bennett

The freedom to make ridiculous rants was purchased with blood and weapons.


So this material will be used to make exploding bullets?

Carlos Grados

@Slowburn: \"The freedom to make ridiculous rants was purchased with blood and weapons.\" ... after it was taken from us with weapons.

It seems a win-win situation for weapon-manufacturers.


re; EinSascha

Or just by bullies that are just bigger and stronger. There is a reason guns are called \"Equalizers\". Weapons empower the weak, far more than the strong.


@slow burn: equalizers, unless you can\'t hit your target. Then you\'re just as dead as you were before guns.

Unless they can grind this stuff into a powder, it will be limited in usefullness. If it is a powder, it could not only be used as the charge but also as the propellant.

Ethan Brush

Existing casings use depleted uranium, which of course remains toxic for centuries.

I love the way they snuck \"in comparison to existing materials\" into their argument - makes it sound nowhere near as dangerous for the people who need to clean up the rubble then try to live there after all the killing has ended...


Isn\'t it just wonderful that the US military has found a more efficient way to kill fellow human beings? What else could the world possibly need?

Marcus Carr

@Marcus Carr - It\'s a more efficient way of killing your ENEMY. I know that word is like the devil these days with all this tree huggin crap, but bottom line, when we go to war against someone, we need the best weapons possible.

Derek Howe

@Derek Howe I have no enemies, much less any I\'d like to blow up with New High-Density Reactive Material. Similarly, \"we\" won\'t be going to war. A government may engage in war in my name, but it will never do so with my blessing or consent.

If we don\'t go to war, we don\'t need any weapons... not even really crap ones. Works for me...

Marcus Carr

This is what war has been missing all along bombs that explode better, about time! Hooray for the US Gov. well done, and just in time for christmas!


It kind of makes me wish Iran would go crazier and try something so we can test out all the new stuff for effectiveness then improve on it!

John Sweet

re; Marcus Carr

since you are unwilling to defend yourself are be defended you had better learn to to disagree with people who tell you something against your own opinion. ..........................................................................................................................

re; John Sweet

I hope that is sarcasm. Besides Iran does not need to get crazier to try something.


@John Sweet, even if that was sarcasm, I think it was in poor taste. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just such an experiment, where civilians were afforded all the dignity and respect usually reserved for lab rats.

Marcus Carr

It is interesting that those that don\'t like weapons find it necessary to try and provoke those that do. Why not just ignore this post or tell the editor you don\'t like articles about weapons of any kind.


Sorry, but the comments on this story have headed off topic. As we think everyone\'s had their fair say so no further comments will be approved.

Post a Comment

Login with your Gizmag account:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our articles