Mosquito trap targets females laying their eggs
By Ben Coxworth
December 24, 2010
Dr. Dawn Wesson, with the traps that attract egg-carrying female mosquitoes (Image: Tulane University)
Image Gallery (2 images)After malaria, dengue fever is the most serious mosquito-borne disease in the world. In an effort to curb its spread, researchers from New Orleans’ Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine have developed mosquito traps that attract and kill egg-bearing females. Using a US$4.6 million grant from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the scientists plan to distribute 10,000 of the traps in Peru’s Iquitos region, an area known for dengue fever.
The traps are filled with a gallon of water, that is laced with both an attractant that mimics ideal egg-laying conditions, and a pesticide that kills the eggs once they’re laid. An insecticidal fabric lining kills the adult mosquitoes that enter the trap.
The approach is unique, as most traps are designed to attract mosquitoes looking for a source of blood. This trap draws in female mosquitoes that have already fed, and that therefore could already have picked up the dengue fever virus from a human host. “If we can lure that mosquito in and kill her before she has that next blood meal, then we can stop that transmission,” said Tulane’s Dr. Dawn Wesson. “If you do that enough times, you can actually stop the transmission of dengue or any other mosquito-borne pathogen. It’s a novel approach to not only mosquito control, but also disease control.”
A different approach has been developed at Israel’s University of Haifa. It uses a naturally-occurring chemical compound to discourage female mosquitoes from laying their eggs in the places they ordinarily would, in hopes that they won’t survive long enough to find an alternate location.
The Tulane research team plans to place their traps in and around homes in Iquitos, at the rate of two or three traps per house. Homeowners will refill the traps weekly, and replace the components bi-monthly. After one year, the team will look at the correlation between mosquito capture numbers and local cases of dengue fever, and compare that with numbers in a control area where no traps are in use.
If the traps are effective, they will next be tested in the Caribbean and Thailand.
“Right now there has really been nothing that can be safely used on a wide, multinational scale to reduce dengue transmission,” said Wesson. “If this trap works, we think it can change a lot of people’s lives.”
An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away. All articles by Ben Coxworth
Maybe they should combine the two techniques. Use both the Tulane attractant and the Israeli repellent within the same region to really get the mosquitos into the traps and nowhere else. And throw in some new bat colonies for good measure. Actually, I'd prefer the last technique to the first two.
Gadgeteer24th December, 2010 @ 07:41 pm PST
Good Innovation but expensive.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Anumakonda Jagadeesh25th December, 2010 @ 08:32 am PST
These are all great efforts, but I'm still waiting for that commercial, off-the-shelf mosquito-zapping laser! What the heck is taking so long with that?
migigawa26th December, 2010 @ 06:39 pm PST
mrhuckfin,
I suggest you read up on the history of the Chesapeake Bay region, where the DDT nearly ravaged the waterfowl and economy.
Its not the wonderful chemical you think it is. I had the opportunity to meet Bill Gates Senior two years ago, and listen to how the work they have sponsored is helping to reduce mosquito populations, and they are to be applauded.
We need to learn to live within the environment, not destroy it for our own convenience.
David Richardson28th December, 2010 @ 06:19 am PST
mrhuckfin,
You say "All well and good but DDT would fix the problem once and for all, we had this whole malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases issue down to zero by the end of the 60's...". If that is true, (DDT was so effective that it reduced mosquito-borne diseases down to zero) then how is it the mosquito's are back?
What DDT did do was nearly kill off the mosquitos natural predators: song birds, bats and whole families of birds all the way up the food chain finally endangering birds of prey. Who knows how many humans and other animals have gotten cancer from that gnarly chemical.
Mess with mother nature and you will pay a hefty price.
Facebook User28th December, 2010 @ 02:31 pm PST
Or Login with Facebook:
Just enter your friends and your email address into the form below
For multiple addresses, separate each with a comma
Privacy is safe with us because we have a strict privacy policy.

All well and good but DDT would fix the problem once and for all, we had this whole malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases issue down to zero by the end of the 60's and now we're back to millions dieing again because of the lie about DDT and it's supposed ill effects! Makes me think that that the powers that be really don't care about human suffering as much as they say they do? More about the power and control that they can have. Here is only one small example of why we should have DDT rather than mess around with things like this, http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/ddt.htm and after this you could read volumes more that would concur with this article.
mrhuckfin24th December, 2010 @ 06:56 pm PST