Excellent concept and design, but... absolutely RIDICULOUS price! $40 grand?!?! Might as well buy a separate ATV and jet ski for a fraction of the price.
16th October, 2012 @ 11:17 a.m. (California Time)
I've seen the "buy a separate jetski and atv" comment on a bunch of sites about this (I'm in no way affiliated with Gibbs).
If you need to go somewhere that includes land and water, then having both is no use. You'd have to be able to tow your atv on a floating trailer behind the jetski on water and vice-versa on land.
The WHOLE point of this thing is it can do BOTH.
I think this thing would be excellent for boat owners (except for the weight). How many times you have to get something from a shop and you're anchored in a bay. With this thing, you just cruise into shore, and drive up to the shop. Awesome. And 40k is chump change for a megayacht owner.
16th October, 2012 @ 1:35 p.m. (California Time)
We should all own this to commute. Less bad accidents. Less polution. Less crowed highways. Im all for it. Now make it inexpensive.
16th October, 2012 @ 5:10 p.m. (California Time)
this thing probably consumes at least 50% more gas the average gas guzzling atv while driving and even more than 50% than the average wave runner.
i could care less about efficiency, the problem is that unless you're using this for commuting, your range on some sort of extended overnight adventure is very much limited by the amount of spare gas you can carry. this vehicle is probably very range limited.
however, for certain types of smuggling , stealth, or military applications, this thing could be pretty sweet.
16th October, 2012 @ 9:09 p.m. (California Time)
Cool, but it costs too much.
17th October, 2012 @ 3:28 a.m. (California Time)
I ride ATV's and one of the things I notice about it is the wheel suspension and linkage doesn't look like it would hold up to much abuse. Sometimes that abuse is intentional (carrying too much speed etc.) but other times it just means carrying a normal amount of speed on bad terrain and hitting a tire-sized pot hole.
Salt water can be pretty unforgiving of something like this too. It definitely isn't an easy problem to solve.
17th October, 2012 @ 5:26 a.m. (California Time)
I'm going to stick mt neck out here and say, "If you find the price to be off-putting...well, you're probably outside their intended target group."
Me? I haven't bought a $30K automobile yet.
17th October, 2012 @ 9:34 a.m. (California Time)
Interesting, has it been tested on snow & ice? Could see one traversing a partially frozen body of water, could save your life over a top of the line snowmobile...
Can both jet & wheels be running simultaneously?
17th October, 2012 @ 9:45 a.m. (California Time)
I've watched the development (or lack thereof - ha!) for years and am happy to see it finally come to market.
The perfect application for this is rescue-oriented jobs like beach lifeguards. It is such an obvious solution that I'm surprised it hasn't been developed by others a long time ago.
If it does get adopted by "Rescue" and, say, military orgs like Coast Guard, Marines, Navy, Seals, etc. it will get all the punishment it can take and that will make the 2nd gen version awesome.
As to the fuel efficiency, I think the kind of adoption above will force that issue to be improved as well.
I hope it succeeds so I can buy one with confidence.
17th October, 2012 @ 10:22 a.m. (California Time)
You know, as a gay man I normally look at things like this as a str8 guy thing. No, I don't want to ride that because I am wearing light weight wool. That being said. I WANT ONE!
17th October, 2012 @ 10:43 a.m. (California Time)
This should be in the next James Bond movie, preferably stunt driven by Ken Block.
17th October, 2012 @ 11:05 a.m. (California Time)
While it may drive on land it can't drive on public roads making it not very useable unless you have a trailer and only use it offroad.
I can see military uses though for special forces.
At that price it won't sell much.
17th October, 2012 @ 11:18 a.m. (California Time)
The final coffin nail in our wetlands and bird sanctuaries. Just what we needed.
17th October, 2012 @ 12:50 p.m. (California Time)
I have to agree here...$40k? And it only sits one user? Not worth my time...or money!
17th October, 2012 @ 5:12 p.m. (California Time)
Markets for: Tourism, Science studies, Rescue, MedEvac,Surveys, Firefighting, SEAL Use ( DoD) & PR in a 007 movie, be awesome. Love to Rent & Own.
17th October, 2012 @ 6:02 p.m. (California Time)
I am going to "stick my neck out" (ha!) and say there are only a couple of cogent points in this thread. The one that really stands out is by WhyEyeWine. Truly someone who is thinking.
I like people to invent stuff that most of us think are useless. Eventually some things come up that in 20 years we can't figure out how we did without. I remember looking at a friend's brother in 1980 who showed me his TRS-80 say hello to him when he said hello to it. I said "that's nice" I thought "way to blow $1000 geekster".
The market will determine the success or failure of this project. That means no O'bummer dollars to prop up the idea until it fails. (if that comment skews your view of this post, I retract it. If it doesn't let it stand : ] )
In the meantime, kudos to Gibbs for putting something he believes in on the market!
18th October, 2012 @ 12:11 p.m. (California Time)
And yet another tool I'd love to own, yet will never afford.
20th October, 2012 @ 8:24 p.m. (California Time)
The $40K price tag will come down once production goes up. Gibbs seems to have come up with an elegant, scalable system (would LOVE to have one of their trucks!).
I look forward to seeing where these thigs wind up being adopted first and to what the next generations of these will look like.
23rd October, 2012 @ 5:11 a.m. (California Time)
Why is it so big & heavy? Plus it seems to be only capable of carrying one person. Some cars weigh 600kg! they carry 4. Not quad bikes. Any ideas of a jetski kerb weight?.
14th November, 2012 @ 8:25 a.m. (California Time)
If it were street legal it could be of use. But being that it is an offroad, only vehicle one would still need a trailer and truck to get it near the water. This thing is not ready for prime time.
20th November, 2012 @ 9:21 p.m. (California Time)
Well a few days ago Mid May 2013 I got an email from Gibbs saying they were now available in the USA. I went to their web page & called the dealer. They are $45,000.00 USD. Not road legal, for water use you probably need to register them as a boat & paint a 3" high number on them. So, hope you can drive it on & off your pickup. May I suggest a hovercraft instead, about the same amount of money, different set of limitations & benifits, Uses a lot less power, & so a lot less gas.
17th May, 2013 @ 9:24 a.m. (California Time)