Computational creativity and the future of AI

Carbyne: The new world's strongest material?


October 14, 2013

Rice University researchers say that carbyne, an elusive allotrope of carbon, could be twi...

Rice University researchers say that carbyne, an elusive allotrope of carbon, could be twice as strong as carbon nanotubes and three times stiffer than diamonds (Image: Vasilii Artyukhov/Rice University)

Image Gallery (2 images)

Researchers at Rice University have used a computer simulation to calculate that carbyne, a monodimensional chain of carbon atoms, is twice as strong as carbon nanotubes and three times stiffer than diamond. If their findings are correct and the challenges posed by manufacturing it can be overcome, then carbyne could prove an incredibly useful material for a wide range of applications.

Carbon by any other name

As you may remember from organic chemistry class, one the main factors that makes carbon so special is its ability to easily bond with atoms, including itself, in a number of different forms. Even tinkering with carbon atoms alone can result in different forms (or allotropes) of carbon, ranging from graphite to diamonds and, more recently, artificial forms such as buckyballs, graphene and carbon nanotubes.

These artificial forms can yield surprising results both in terms of their mechanical strength and their possible applications, such as in next-gen electronics. So it should come at no surprise that scientists are looking to uncover new allotropes with similar, perhaps even superior features.

Carbyne, or linear acetylenic carbon, is yet another allotrope of carbon that grows in a single chain with alternating single and triple atomic bonds. As it is a single atom-thick chain and not a sheet (like graphene) or a hollow tube (like carbon nanotubes), it is considered a truly one-dimensional material. Scientists have long believed that this single dimension might give carbyne unparalleled mechanical and electrical properties.

Carbyne and its properties

Nanoropes or nanorods of carbyne, a chain of carbon atoms, would be stronger than graphene...

Rice University theoretical physicist Boris Yakobson and his team set out to describe the properties of carbyne by using the information available from previous research and combining it within a computer simulation to shed a lot more light on the properties of this elusive material.

After confirming that carbyne is stable at room temperature, largely resisting interaction with nearby carbyne atom chains, the researchers went on to find that carbyne has indeed remarkable, unprecedented features of its own.

In terms of mechanical properties its tensile strength, or its ability to withstand stretching, is double that of graphene. According to the computer model, carbyne is also twice as stiff as graphene and three times as stiff as diamonds and, interestingly, carbyne's torsional stiffness can be modified by attaching appropriate molecules at the end of each carbon chain.

According to Yakobson, carbyne also turns out to have some very interesting and unique electrical features. Molecules can be attached to each end of the chain to make it suitable for storing energy, its band gap, an important electric property that determines its electrical conductivity, can be stretched from 3.2 to 4.4 eV just by stretching the material by ten percent and finally, when twisted by 90 degrees, carbyne also turns into a magnetic semiconductor.

What's next?

If these predictions are true, then the versatility of carbyne could one day lead to important advances in fields ranging from the design of new nanoelectronic and spintronic devices to building very high-performance mechanical parts.

Unfortunately, knowing its properties and being able to harness them are two very distinct problems. While carbyne has been detected in interstellar dust and compressed graphite, it is proving very challenging to recreate in the lab (researchers have only managed to create very small chains of up to 44 atoms). But at the very least, studies such as this might encourage more investment toward solving the practical problems of manufacturing longer carbyne chains.

Yakobson and colleagues now say that they will take a closer look at the conductivity of carbyne, and specifically at the relationship between twisting and its band gap. Their future work will also include finding out whether other elements in the periodic table are also capable of forming similar monodimensional chains.

A paper describing the materials appears in a recent issue of the journal ACS Nano.

Source: Rice University

About the Author
Dario Borghino Dario studied software engineering at the Polytechnic University of Turin. When he isn't writing for Gizmag he is usually traveling the world on a whim, working on an AI-guided automated trading system, or chasing his dream to become the next European thumbwrestling champion.   All articles by Dario Borghino

If the band gap is so flexible, then it should be ideal for solar cell storage, enabling far more of the solar spectrum to be used ! Fantastic !

Peter Winquist
15th October, 2013 @ 01:34 am PDT

How could anything actually exist in only one dimension? Even an atom must have a diameter, and the chain has length.

This sounds like the same sort of logic used all too frequently by engineers and other scientists who love to attach the theoretical value of nought (zero) to real objects. Most frequently used in computery where a machine with 2 hard-drives has them numbered "0" and "1" - clearly impossible since zero, by definition, obviously does not exist. There are other examples which betray the users' complete misunderstanding of what has been a fundamental principle of mathermatics for a very long time - at least many hundreds, if not thousands of years.

Imagine if the first three people across a winning line of some sort were called "zero, one and two". Should the announcer be saying "In zero'th place is X " ? Or "and the winner of the zero'th prize is Y" ?

15th October, 2013 @ 06:25 am PDT


"one-dimensional nano structure" is only a term in nanotechnology to describe what kind of structure it is.

Don't try to put more meaning (and confusion) into it than necessary.

15th October, 2013 @ 07:35 am PDT

Hello Space Elevator!

Seth Miesters
15th October, 2013 @ 08:15 am PDT

@professore, you may have noticed that computers like binary. Bits have two states, and unless you assign one of them a value of zero, you can't count with them. Starting to count from zero works very nicely for many applications, not least because n^0 is always 1, and modulus operations actually work. Because of this, most technical applications start from zero because it makes very many things much easier. Something having a value of zero does not mean that it does not have a value (an entirely different concept). Just because you have trouble grasping that doesn't make it wrong. You'd probably have a hard time with complex numbers too.

In your race, the winner is the first one on the results list, and his distance from the start of the list is 0. The same idea works for your hard drives.

Aside from that I quite agree that this is an abuse of the term "one-dimensional".

15th October, 2013 @ 08:54 am PDT

more recently, artificial forms such as buckyballs, graphene and carbon nanotubes.

This is a false statement. Buckyballs are abundant in space an noted in 2010

"Space buckyballs thrive, finds NASA Spitzer Telescope." 28 Oct 2010.

J. LightFeather
15th October, 2013 @ 01:39 pm PDT

I'm with Peter on this one.

If the material proves possible to manufacture it could be used to make very strong structures that are also natively solar energy collectors

15th October, 2013 @ 03:21 pm PDT

Hmmm, we can make a space elevator that produces electricity there by powering the gondolas . Now someone needs to, first make really long pieces and then do it cheaply .

15th October, 2013 @ 03:55 pm PDT

Sounds like science has finally caught up to Larry Niven's "Sinclair Molecular Chain".

Gregg Eshelman
15th October, 2013 @ 11:05 pm PDT

@ randomray

Elevators already use regenerative breaking.

16th October, 2013 @ 07:13 pm PDT


Yes, elevators do use regenerative braking, as will space elevators. But there are inevitable losses in the system, as well as loads other than motion related (lighting, heating/cooling, communication, etc.). And wouldn't it be nice to have the elevator column supply excess solar derived energy to terrestrial grids?

David Bell
17th October, 2013 @ 10:15 am PDT

A carbyne can occur as a short-lived reactive intermediate. For instance, fluoromethylidyne (CF) can be detected in the gas phase by spectroscopy as an intermediate in the flash photolysis of CHFBr2.[2]

Carbynes can act as trivalent ligands in many complexes with transition metals[3][4] connected to a metal by the three non-bonded electrons in the -C3• group.

So one day i could make a superconducter fusion reactor housed inside a carbyde battery case?YAY i cant wait!!! woot

Antony Innit
18th October, 2013 @ 03:32 am PDT


The band gap is not all that flexible. The article says it "can be stretched from 3.2 to 4.4 eV JUST by stretching the material by ten percent ", but that "just" is a whopper of an understatement. This material is touted as the strongest in the world. It should have a correspondingly high Young's modulus, so stretching it by as much as ten percent would call for an enormous force. And how would you apply this force? Anything you attach to the ends of the molecular chain to stretch it couldn't be any stronger (and it couldn't be bulkier either, as there is simply no room for more than one atom there). So the attachment point would break long before you even begun to approach the 10% elongation. This reasoning applies to the material in bulk as well, only more so.

The scientists arrived at these band-gap data by simply simulating a 10% elongation in the computer. But actually achieving it is another matter altogether, if it is feasible at all. As an analogy, it is trivial in a heat-transfer modeling program to simulate a ping-pong ball glowing with heat at sun-like intensity. But no actual ping-pong ball can be heated to the required thousands of degrees in RL.

18th October, 2013 @ 04:43 am PDT

Regarding the one dimensional statement, I truly think they mean "Mono-Dimensional" which is quite different in atomic means 1 atom of, NOT 1 dimensional, that would be impossible for a 3D atom, wouldn't it!? lol

18th October, 2013 @ 03:47 pm PDT

@ Freederick, you mention,

"Anything you attach to the ends of the molecular chain to stretch it couldn't be any stronger (and it couldn't be bulkier either, as there is simply no room for more than one atom there). So the attachment point would break long before you even begun to approach the 10% elongation. This reasoning applies to the material in bulk as well, only more so."

Not so, you can attach a "chinese finger puller" type of attachment that will have more bonds added over a longer span of carbyne rope and overlap a few more of these attachments over the finger puller at a tapered angle for a combined strength of both compression and tension that is superior to the carbyne.

However, the compression caused by a molecular finger puller may cause the carbyne's molecular bond to weaken a little if the taper is set at too steep of an angle, resulting in a faulty distribution of load and inaccurate measurement of the true tensile property.

Gary Richardson
20th October, 2013 @ 12:57 am PDT

we live in a 3 dimensional world everything is 3 dimensional here...

Giorgos Giorgakis
20th October, 2013 @ 06:15 am PDT

Carbon-carbon triple bonds are extremely energetic, as anyone who has any practical experience of acetylene can confirm - often from bitter experience.

What happens if an object made of this stuff catches fire?

21st October, 2013 @ 07:00 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 31,564 articles