Shopping? Check out our latest product comparisons

Boeing's new light attack helicopter takes to the skies

By

May 7, 2014

Boeing has tested its AH-6i light attack helicopter for the first time in its production c...

Boeing has tested its AH-6i light attack helicopter for the first time in its production configuration

Image Gallery (2 images)

Boeing has flown its new light attack/reconnaissance helicopter for the first time in its production configuration. A prototype of the AH-6i was taken through preliminary tests in a flight lasting less than 20 minutes. The flight brings the model one step closer to full production.

The AH-6i, part of the AH-6 line, is designed to provide close-air support for land-based forces and to launch attacks on land-based facilities such as tanks, armored vehicles and fortifications. It is based on the OH-6A Cayuse, which was widely used during the Vietnam conflict, and is a more sophisticated version of the AH-6M that is currently used by the US Army Special Operations Forces.

The AH-6i uses a single turbine and features an advanced fuel system to give it an extended-range. It has a number of sensors that make it effective for day and night operations, and which provide operational flexibility. Its weapons configuration can also be easily changed and it makes use of a variety of technologies from the Boeing AH-64E Apache multi-role attack helicopter that Boeing says, "give it superior performance over other aircraft in its class."

During the test flight, Boeing pilots flew the AH-6i at low speeds and elevations. Forward, rearward and sideward movements were run through. Boeing AH-6 program director Scott Rudy explains that the successful completion of the flight will allow for more complex testing over the coming months and, ultimately, commercial production of the aircraft.

"This first AH-6 flight in the production configuration takes us closer to delivering an advanced light attack and reconnaissance helicopter that meets the needs of defense forces around the world," says Rudy.

Source: Boeing

About the Author
Stu Robarts Stu is a tech writer based in Liverpool, UK. He has previously worked on global digital estate management at Amaze and headed up digital strategy for FACT (Foundation for Art and Creative Technology). He likes cups of tea, bacon sandwiches and RSS feeds.   All articles by Stu Robarts
9 Comments

Cost about a few billion ,cost to shoot down ,less then 20 pence for a well placed bullet from a gun cost about less then a hundred dollars ,cost to train rebel free ,as poverty made him do it ,

Richardf
7th May, 2014 @ 04:07 am PDT

This is probably designed both for manned and unmanned operations. I wouldn't want to be in one in a combat situation.

kwarks
7th May, 2014 @ 05:08 am PDT

re: Richardf > thumbs up for your comment.

So true. There's an amazing number of wannabe patriots out there agreeing in whatever spending it takes to beef up the military, with zero worries about cost.

And the same people scream bloody hell and "communism" when it is about paying taxes to have good social programs, and development aid for poor countries even tho very single dollar there prevents more people from ever turning terrorist than all the funding going into war machinery.

Helping and preventing is ridiculously cheaper than fighting the nasty side effects of social injustice. But helping doesn't make these industries rich. And if we need "jobs" producing death and destruction to keep our economy afloat, we are very doomed, in a very basic sense.

BeWalt
7th May, 2014 @ 11:56 am PDT

yes the Military Industrial Complex that Dwight G Eisenhower warned us about before I was born in 1954 is alive and well. stop this madness

Bill Bennett
7th May, 2014 @ 10:11 pm PDT

This is just an update of a 40 year old Hughes/McDonnel Cayuse. With all the advances in computer CAD/CAM systems and advanced materials, not to mention controls, why can't we produce a kick-butt chopper in less time that is less expensive ?

dugnology
8th May, 2014 @ 09:08 am PDT

An old design is not necessarily bad. The DC3, (U.S.Army CH47), is still one of the best, most flyable aircraft ever conceived. Many are still flying.

What this article and the pictures do not show are material and engineering changes incorporated in this incarnation. Also, as far the anti-military noisy voices are concerned, whenever the crap is hitting the fan you people are very pleased to have people like me come charging in to forcibly restore order. Peace is not free or cheap. Cowardice is. The current examples for effective military tools can be seen in Syria, Yemen, and Nigeria, just for starters.

StWils
8th May, 2014 @ 11:53 am PDT

dugnology has a valid point in that advancing technology is not reflected in new airframes for helicopters. The AH-6, CH-47, etc. are not of course really the same as the originals that were used in the '60s. The drive trains & the avionics (electronics) have been repeatedly updated. The Army's Joint Multi-role Rotorcraft project will eventually replace most existing helos in use by all the armed forces. A lot of ifs in that, the biggest of which is currently sequestration. The private sector has already built prototypes of helos with propellers that fly much faster than existing ones.

theotherwill
8th May, 2014 @ 05:43 pm PDT

A decent attack helicopter should have a decent number of attackers on board, IMHO, all sitting behind a decent power tool poking through some decent titanium.

Attacking should always be done decently lol

nutcase
8th May, 2014 @ 08:15 pm PDT

@ nutcase

2 a pilot and a gunner. Several people with pop guns is just a waste of space and lift.

Slowburn
9th May, 2014 @ 10:24 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 27,809 articles