Shopping? Check out our latest product comparisons

Pinoccio: A wireless, gossiping microcontroller for the Internet of Things

By

April 16, 2013

The Pinoccio ecosystem aims to provide 'a complete ecosystem for building the Internet of ...

The Pinoccio ecosystem aims to provide 'a complete ecosystem for building the Internet of Things'

Image Gallery (3 images)

Pinoccio is a new Internet of Things-friendly microcontroller designed to get home-brew electronics projects talking to the internet and, usefully, each other. Pinoccios come with or without Wi-Fi capability, but can wirelessly natter away with each other by low-power radio using mesh networking. And an in-built battery untethers your projects (hence the name, d'uh). Think of these as Arduino's roaming gossipy cousins, then.

Mesh networking means that each device on the network must relay any information it hears from others on the network, as well as burbling away with its own information. One advantage of this approach is that, to communicate with the internet, only a single Pinnocio on the mesh network need be equipped with a Wi-Fi shield, saving both money up front, and battery life in use. All other Pinnocios can communicate with the web through the Wi-Fi-capable board.

Pinoccios are compatible with the popular Arduino open source hardware platform, and make use of its development tools for uploading software to the devices. As with other Arduino-compatible boards, the Pinoccio can be used with external sensors, though it includes a temperature sensor as standard.

They're small too. Though we haven't seen dimensions, but judging by the comparison pictures a Pinoccio is half the size of an Arduino Uno.

The Pinoccio microcontroller has an optional Wi-Fi shield available for internet connectio...

Each Pinoccio comes equipped with a lithium polymer battery, which is said to provide days, weeks, or possibly months of life depending on how the board is used.

To add to the Pinoccio's Internet of Things-iness, its developers are offering the use of a web server, plus an API which allocates each web-connected board its own web address, and allows the devices to send and receive messages from web applications. (Naturally, pro users can set up their own web servers if they like.)

Following a successful Indiegogo funding campaign, the first Pinoccios are expected to ship this July. The base board was priced US$49 without Wi-Fi and $99 with. We'd expect prices to be similar when the Pinoccio is officially released.

Sources: Pinoccio, Indiegogo

The promotional video gives an idea of the sort of projects Pinoccio's makers envisage.

About the Author
Donna Taylor After years of working in software delivery, Donna seized the opportunity to head back to university and this time study a lifelong passion: Architecture. Originally from the U.K. and after living in many countries, Donna and her family are now settled in Western Australia. When not writing Donna can be found at the University of Western Australia's Architecture, Landscape and Visual Arts Department.   All articles by Donna Taylor
4 Comments

Still far too expensive for an unit. 50$ for a base board? A nordic transceiver is $2 and an atmel85 is 0.5$. Add 10$ to justify development cost and I could see myself spring for one of these, but $50 is prohibitive I think.

What's your take?

Morten Nørgaard
17th April, 2013 @ 03:37 am PDT

Hey Morten, this is Sally from Pinoccio. You raise a good point, and you're not the first to ask about the price. We did a couple of blog posts that explore price, along with our goals for the platform:

http://pinocc.io/blog/open-source-hardware/a-cheaper-pinoccio-board/

http://pinocc.io/blog/open-source-hardware-business/a-race-to-the-bottom/

Hope that helps to shed some light! Thanks for the comment!

Sally Bike
17th April, 2013 @ 08:30 am PDT

@Sally alright fair enough; I can see you're a very small company yet and have to oursource all your production, so in a sense that justifies the cost of a unit - in as much as your just starting up. And you're going open source, which is admirable - cudos. Good to see you're contemplating catering to the 'true' internet of things - by which I mean a house filled with 100+ units all meshed up. Keep up the good work.

Morten Nørgaard
17th April, 2013 @ 12:43 pm PDT

Thanks Morten! And thanks for the good questions, it's always healthy to get this kind of feedback. Cheers! :)

Sally Bike
17th April, 2013 @ 03:02 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,286 articles