Apple announces iPhone 6, Apple Watch

4x, 8x, huh? How much power do Lithium batteries actually have?

By

October 18, 2009

Energizer 4X and 8X Lithium batteries

Energizer 4X and 8X Lithium batteries

Image Gallery (2 images)

These days, if you go looking for batteries you're likely to find a range of products with some fairly bold claims on their packaging. Standard AA alkaline batteries are the least expensive and have been around for decades, but now there's a bunch of other choices for single use batteries that are marketed as better choices for "digital" devices than the "copper top" or store branded staples we've used for years. Among the newest of these is Energizer's Advanced Lithium and Ultimate Lithium single use batteries.

The the first question that comes to mind is, how much power do these bad boys actually have? Rechargeable batteries are clearly labeled, in fact, we have a couple of AA NiMH ones lying around here that state that they hold 2500mAh of power. With NiMH batteries the formulation can be tweaked to extend shelf life at the expense of total capacity, and we've seen modern batteries ranging from 2100mAh to 2900mAh based upon this. This makes it easy to decide which to get, just do the math and pick your poison.

With single use batteries, it's not so easy. There's no power rating anywhere on the packaging for most alkaline batteries nor is there any on Energizer's Lithium batteries, and in fact the packaging just says 4x for the Advanced Lithium and a whopping 8x for the Ultimate Lithium. But 4 or 8 times what?

The answer turns out to be simple, albeit irritatingly deceptive. All of the current formulations of single use batteries currently sold have a capacity of approximately 3000mAh and a voltage close to 1.5V! We know that this seems like it can't possibly be right. Energizer is claiming 4x and 8x the power of "regular" batteries, and charging a small fortune per 4 pack for these Lithium varieties primarily based upon these claims. So what's going on here?

Apparently, the issue at work isn't how much power each of these battery holds, but how much you can get out of the battery, before it refuses to yield any more of it's energy. Traditional alkaline batteries generate power from a reaction between a zinc electrode that is stuck into a canister containing a paste of manganese oxide. This works well if the power is drawn slowly from the battery, since the reaction can spread throughout the entire volume of manganese oxide in the battery cylinder. Unfortunately this doesn't hold true when power is extracted quickly (as in the case of a digital camera, or other high power devices). When power is drawn out quickly from one of these batteries, the reaction doesn't reach the entire volume of the battery, and the paste that surrounds the zinc electrode ends up coating it with depleted reactants, which cuts the zinc electrode off from the remainder of the manganese oxide it could react with. So while you could get the full 3000mAh out with a low draw device, you may only be able to get 700 or 1000mAh when you're drawing high current with your camera.

Single use lithium batteries are constructed differently. The reactants are placed on a flat sheet, and then rolled up to fit inside the canister of a AA battery. This means that there's a LOT more reaction area, and hence more opportunity to draw as much power as possible out of the battery before a coating can build up on the electrodes. Energizer says that their 4x and 8x claims are based upon this. They also explained that the difference between their 4x and 8x products is the internal surface area. The battery layers are thinner in the 8x device, so have significantly more surface area rolled up into the canister. The Advanced Lithium devices cost less to manufacture than the Ultimate Lithium ones, so there's a nice correlation between performance and price. At least from the perspective of a manufacturer.

So 4x and 8x are actually marketing breakthroughs and not technical ones. And while it's possible to believe that the claims are true and that you can get 8 times the power out of an Ultimate Lithium battery than a normal battery, you really have to turn your thinking upside down to do so. There isn't any way to measure consistently how much you'll be getting out of a traditional battery without testing it in a particular device, and without doing so, any specific claims of better performance lie somewhere between wishful thinking and unconfirmable conjecture.

It's not that these premium lithium batteries aren't better, it's just that there isn't a way to tell if they're 4 or 8 times better, or if they're worth the price premium that they demand.

7 Comments

Probably one of the most useful and practical articles this week. We need more consumer information like this to battle the "dis"information seen on wild marketing claims.

I used the energizer rechargeables, and they have more than paid for themselves many times over. A single charge does not last as long as the lithium batteries, but with a spare set in my camera pouch, they do. (I still can't remember the last time I took so many pictures in a day that I actually had to change out a set of rechargeables for another spare set).

The easiest way to extend battery life in a digital camera is to turn off the LCD screen for framing the picture, just use the viewfinder (if you have one), and check the screen only for a quick view of the pic. That one trick about quadruples my battery life.

matthew.rings
19th October, 2009 @ 05:40 pm PDT

Great article.

I purpose a side by side functional test in a resistive and a digital load.

Get 'normal' batteries, 4x and 8x and put them in 3 flashlights and 3 digital cameras. Run them randomly but simultaneously to represent normal use. If a battery has 4x the power, it should last 4 times longer. Likewise with the 8x. I'm pretty sure we won't see anywhere near that in real life.

I've always been against using Rare Earth Elements in anything disposable. It is such a waste. Save the lithium for lithium-ion. NiMH batteries are well worth the money. You pay a little less than twice as much as lithium but can realistically recharge them hundreds of times.

Raum Bances
15th November, 2009 @ 08:44 am PST

"Rare Earth Elements"? ridiculous! Lithium is one of the most common elements. I think it is the 25th most common. And decides that Rare Earth Elements are a class of elements in a particular location on the periodic table that happen to be rare. Lithium is the third element...nowhere near the Rare Earth Elements.

Mindbreaker
29th November, 2009 @ 07:16 pm PST

Being somewhat disabled, I spend a lot of time sitting. This has changed my attitude about battery management of rechargables vs just buying the use once/ throw away kind. I keep track of the charged vs discharged battery voltages to better understand what is happening with the batteries. This article is the first to explain to me why I get such diminishing returns from rechargables when used in cameras, cell phones, and other high power-using devices. Of lately I have particularly noticed that my used cell phone lith-ion batteries show an average 4.15v when charged and when device says they are completely discharged, they still show an average 3.75v which sometimes can happen in less than a day. At least now I know what is happening to them but I'm still not happy that it is happening. I really hate having to recycle perfectly good rechargeable batteries because of this! I've heard you can shock them into performing better either by electric shock or freezing them for couple hours but I have yet to test this theory.

Will, the tink
16th June, 2011 @ 03:23 pm PDT

Consumer reports just rated the lithium batteries for digital cameras and rated the advanced version almost twice as good as the ultimate version??

In other words the advanced cost a little less and took almost twice the number of pictures.

Paul S. Gritt
11th November, 2011 @ 02:32 pm PST

MY experience is with wireless microphone transmitters. I started using energizer 4x only because I didn't know about 8x. Went from changing copper top every 4 hours to 4x at 8-9 hrs and then 8x to at least 15 hours These are killer batteries for me Tried using rechargeables but the transmitters didn't like 1.25 volts. 8x have never failed me

fast
28th November, 2011 @ 08:46 pm PST

The lithium batteries are great. At my local retailer they cost 25% - 30% more than the standard batteries but they last a lot longer. I use them in a medical EMS unit that will drain regular batteries in 2-3 hours. With the lithium (advanced) I am getting 8-10 hours.

Well worth the price IMO. I've tried rechargeable batteries but I feel like I'm charging them so constantly that I'm not sure it's saving me much money. Over a short period of time they seem to need charging more and more often. Not worth the effort IMO. Especially having and disability. Moving around is a privilege for me.

Sean Dalrymple
16th November, 2013 @ 07:09 pm PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,460 articles