Shopping? Check out our latest product comparisons

Scientists create artificial mother of pearl

By

July 26, 2012

A sample of the man-made mother of pearl (top), compared to the real thing (Image: Nature)...

A sample of the man-made mother of pearl (top), compared to the real thing (Image: Nature)

Mother of pearl, also known as nacre, is the hard iridescent coating found on the outside of pearls, and the inside of certain mollusc’s shells. Besides being a nice-looking material used for jewelry and other types of ornamentation, it’s also remarkably strong. Now, scientists from the University of Cambridge have discovered how to make the stuff themselves.

The scientists created a liquid solution composed mainly of calcium carbonate (the main ingredient in natural, mollusc-made nacre), mixed with ions and organic components. The inclusion of the last two ingredients keeps the calcium carbonate from crystallizing, as it’s precipitated from the solution to form a layer on the desired surface.

Next, a layer of “organic material” is added to that layer of precipitate – this second layer contains pores measuring ten nanometers across. Crystallization of the precipitate layer is then induced, while the covering layer of organic material remains as it was. This process is repeated a number of times, resulting in a coating made up of multiple alternating crystallized and organic layers ... just like real mother of pearl.

Although existing man-made coatings are tougher than the synthetic nacre, the fact that it can be made from inexpensive ingredients at ambient temperatures means that it could be a good choice for economical protective coatings.

“Crystals have a characteristic shape that reflects their atomic structure, and it is very difficult to modify this shape,” said Cambridge’s Professor Ulli Steiner. “Nature is, however, able to do this, and through our research we were able to gain insight into how it grows these materials. Essentially, we have created a new recipe for mother of pearl using nature's cookbook.”

A paper on the research was published yesterday in the journal Nature Materials.

Source: University of Cambridge

About the Author
Ben Coxworth An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away.   All articles by Ben Coxworth
1 Comment

Luthiers will find this material both intriguing and irritating. It's potential as an inexpensive and eco-friendly decorative, more easily formed replacement for the real stuff is great. So is its potential for its use being swept up by the major manufacturers of cheaper musical instruments and bringing the value of the work performed by the artisans down to near nothing. What I didn't read here is if needs to be worked under water to avoid breathing in the toxic dust caused by grinding, etc., like the real shells do?

Myron J. Poltroonian
27th July, 2012 @ 03:02 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 27,809 articles