DJ Hero Review
Nissan's LandGlider Narrow track vehicles - the convergence of the car and the motorcycle
Emue and Visa Europe have been working closely over the past 18 months to develop the Visa... Anti-fraud credit card features E-Ink display
SPDY from Google's Chromium development team has achieved 55 percent faster page loading t... Google SPDY aims to make web faster
BMW has brought back the C1 as an electric-powered concept scooter called the C1-E E is for electric: The BMW C1-E concept scooter
Yes, that's supposed to be a piece of underwear. No, me neither. C-string makes your average thong look like grannypants (NSFW)
MORE TOP STORIES »
ECOGIZMO

Solar panel industry achieves Holy Grail - $1 per watt grid-parity

By Paul Evans

15:02 March 3, 2009 PST

First Solar has broken the $1 per watt price barrier

First Solar has broken the $1 per watt price barrier

Arizona based First Solar has achieved a major milestone in reducing the manufacturing cost for solar panels below the $1 per watt price barrier - the target necessary for solar to compete with coal-burning electricity on the grid or grid-parity. Using cadmium telluride (CdTe) technology in its thin-film photovoltaic cells, First Solar claims to have the lowest manufacturing cost per watt in the industry with the ability to make solar cells at 98 cents per watt, one third of the price of comparable standard silicon panels. The efficiency is in part due to a low cycle time - 2.5 hours from sheet of glass to solar module - about a tenth of the time it takes for silicon equivalents.

Thin film cadmium telluride solar panels have an active element just a hundredth the thickness of silicon used in conventional solar panels built on a glass substrate, facilitating the production of large panels. The process and machinery used is so secret that visitors to the company's 500 megawatt production facility are barred from getting an up close look at the production line.

First Solar

First Solar was founded in 1999, but the history of the company goes back decades. Founder Harold McMaster made his first fortune in the late 1940s with Permaglass and later went onto Glasstech. McMaster was one of the world's experts on tempered glass. In the 80s, McMaster became interested in solar technology and experimented with different ways to put photovoltaic materials on glass. He worked first with silicon and then cadmium-telluride with a company called Solar Cells, which was reincarnated as First Solar in 1999.

First Solar began full commercial operation of its initial manufacturing line in late 2004. From 2004 through today, manufacturing capacity has grown 2,500 percent to more than 500 megawatts in 2008. The company expects its annual production capacity to double in 2009 to more than 1 gigawatt, the equivalent of an average-sized nuclear power plant. These escalating volumes have been accompanied by a rapid reduction in manufacturing costs. From 2004 through today, First Solar’s manufacturing costs have declined two-thirds from over $3 per watt to less than $1 per watt and the company is confident that further significant cost reductions are possible based on the yet untapped potential of its technology and manufacturing process.

The alternatives

Silicon cells, which have dominated the market since its commercial launch in the 1950s, may still represent viable competition to Thin Film technology. Silicon cells have an average cell conversion efficiency of around 16-20% while Thin Film CdTe panels are only 10.6% efficient. Due to the enormous growth experienced by the Solar industry in recent years, the price of raw silicon peaked in 2008 at $1000/kg which has kept the manufacturing cost of silicon based cells fluctuating between $3 and $4 per watt. Now that increased silicon production capacity has caught up with demand from the solar cell industry and the Global financial downturn has reduced demand from the computer chip industry, the price of silicon has dropped to under $40/kg. The result - we can expect to see substantial deductions in the cost of silicon solar cells in the near future.

There are also other technologies on the horizon including cells based on copper indium gallium ­diselenide (CIGS), silicon on glass, and the combination of ­germanium, gallium arsenide, and gallium ­indium phosphide all of which are competing to lower the cost of solar cells.

Paul Evans

Via First Solar.

Tags
User Comments (2)
 

While it is good to see manufacturing costs down, it doesn't cross the hurdle of cost per kwh. Currently, the cost per kwh is about $.25, and the US average is $.10. Additionally, solar only works when the sun is out.

Solar has its place in electricity generating market place, but I don't think it will ever replace the consistent base loads provided by coal or nuclear.

I have read some great articles on the costs and benefits of alternative energy at http://www.economicefficiency.blogspot.com

comment

gormanwvzb

- March 10, 2009 @ 02:03 pm CDT

gomanwvzb

The cost per watt at $1.00 is for installed GENERATING capacity, not the cost per watt produced. Once the solar cell is in place, it produces electricity for free.

comment

Gary Ansorge

- November 18, 2009 @ 07:11 pm CST

RSS Feed for comments from this article RSS Feed for comments from all articles
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:




Or Login with Facebook:


Connect

Related Articles Email this article to a friend

Just enter your friends and your email address into the form below ...




Privacy is safe with us because we have a strict privacy policy.

Recent popular articles in ecoGizmo
Recent Comments