Top 100: The most desirable cars of all time

SEAD identifies the most energy-efficient TVs available

By

November 27, 2012

The Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment Initiative singles out the most eff...

The Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment Initiative singles out the most efficient flat-panel televisions (Photo: Lee Nachtigal)

Size, resolution, the underlying display technology, 3D or not 3D, contrast ratio: these are all things one considers before splashing out on a television. How many of us think about energy consumption? The SEAD Initiative (Super-efficient Equipment and Appliance Deployment) is laboring under the apprehension that however many it is, it's not enough. What's it doing about? It's launching Global Efficiency Medal awards to very visibly identify the most energy-efficient flat-panel TVs (and other electronics), and last week it announced its winners ahead of an awards ceremony in January.

Not only has SEAD identified the three TVs it claims are the most energy-efficient in their respective size categories, but it's also picked out a forthcoming TV (equipped with some of that "emerging technology" gubbins) that it thinks will lead the proverbial charge of the energy efficient televisions of the next few years.

Assuming consumers will pay any attention at all to this announcement, it's rather good news for both Samsung and LG. Samsung's catchily named UN26EH4000F was identified as the most television TV in what is laughably described as the "small-size category," which in fact includes all televisions under 29 inches.

Anything from 29 inches up to, though not including, 42 inches qualifies for what is equally-hilariously described as the "medium-size" category – an award which was shared between Samsung's UE40EH5000W and UN40EH5000F televisions. Yes. Those. And in the apotheosis of understatement, the "large-size category" (42 inches and up) saw LG's equally imaginatively named 47LM670S singled out for the crown.

Though SEAD acknowledges that the energy efficiency of flat panel TVs has markedly improved since their emergence, it claims that the best TVs identified by the awards are "33 to 44 percent more efficient than those with similar technologies," (though its not clear if that's in comparison to the mean consumption of all models in their size, or whatever else).

The SEAD Initiative also identified an LG prototype TV as Global Emerging Technology Winner: a 47-inch backlit LCD prototype which will apparently be available within two years. It claims the prototype is "59 percent more efficient than commercially available televisions with comparable technology," which, again, is frustratingly loose phrasing.

The SEAD Initiative is run by the governments of Australia, Brazil, Canada, the European Commission, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

While it's all well and good to single out exemplar models, it's unlikely that people will select a TV based on energy efficiency alone. Perhaps more useful would be for the SEAD member nations to pass legislation in their respective countries that forces retailers to list power consumption, in use and in standby, in the specs sheet, to help consumers (and particularly those on hellish electricity tariffs) to factors efficiency into their thinking.

Source: SEAD, via Clean Technica

About the Author
James Holloway James lives in East London where he punctuates endless tea drinking with freelance writing and meteorological angst. Unlocking Every Extend Extra Extreme’s “Master of Extreme” achievement was the fourth proudest moment of his life.   All articles by James Holloway
Tags
2 Comments

In Australia the annual power consumption is listed on the front of the screen in the shops., as well as a comparative rating in the form of efficiency stars.

The annual consumption assumes that the TV is left on 10 hours a day, so if a TV consumes 220kWh a year, divide by 365 and then by 10 to give your instantaneous power consumption. For example 220kWh annual equates to about 60 Watts instantaneous.

Actual power consumption is often less than advertised if you turn the brightness down to a comfortable viewing level.

Wombat56
27th November, 2012 @ 04:32 pm PST

Quote: "How many of us think about energy consumption?" Surely? Everyone? Now?

I do admit to having been a bit obsessive in the past, when I lived full time on a cruising yacht, with just one 80W solar panel, 4 deep cycle batteries, and no grid to plug into. Which was well before I saw and was shocked by the graph of the exponential rise of CO2 since James Watt developed his useable engines.

Come on people! Power down. For our great grand-children's sake. And their's, even more so.

Sqidge
2nd December, 2012 @ 05:02 am PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,888 articles
Recent popular articles in Environment
Product Comparisons