Top 100: The most desirable cars of all time

1300 bhp monster truck delivers 50-60 yards per gallon (and fires refrigerators)

By

September 6, 2011

1300 bhp monster truck fires refrigerators

1300 bhp monster truck fires refrigerators

Modern technology is capable of creating some astounding vehicles, as is evidenced by a behemoth of remarkable proportions that will be one of the attractions at the forthcoming Top Gear Live shows in the U.K. Each 6ft x 4ft wheel/tire combination of the Ford 350 Monster truck weighs in at a quarter of a ton, but that's no problem because its methanol-burning, supercharged 9.5 liter Chevy motor produces 1300 bhp and more than 1000 ft-lb of torque.

Economical it is not, delivering a jaw-dropping 50-60 yards per gallon thanks to its 4.5 tonne weight. Completing the over-the-top creation, the truck is fitted with a 600 psi air cannon capable of firing any object up to 650 kg (1,433 lb). Refrigerators go more than 80 yards (73 m), scooters (pictured) go a lot further.

Named Red Dragon, the monster was built by former European Monster Truck Champion, Rob Williams, and will be one of the many attractions at the Top Gear Live shows at NEC Birmingham (November 11 - 13) and ExCeL London (November 24 - 27).

Tags
16 Comments

I realise small boys like big toys but in a world that's running out of resources, isn't this rather obscene?

Alien
6th September, 2011 @ 07:41 am PDT

It burns methanol...

James Tarquin Davis
6th September, 2011 @ 08:28 am PDT

I disagree Alien, I strongly disagree. I think we need to let people have fun like this. This is what pushes the world forward. As an inventor myself in the alternative energy and alternative transport field I find your attitude appalling.

We DO need to keep being extra frugal and vigilant with our daily resources(using less energy in our homes, cars and jobs, using vehicles and other systems that use less resources, heating with renewable energy such as waste-wood and switchgrass) that gives us a bit of leeway for motorsports and exotic designs. If we use 20% less resources in our lives, then we should have earned the right to use 5% on things like this. Because we are still being 15% more responsible than 90% of the world. And that 5% might be whats needed to invent the next big step in vehicular technology. Electric is a long way off and is actually only 40% efficient. Just 5% more efficient than a gasoline engine. 80% of the renewable energy systems available today are obscenely expensive.

If we don't let people dream and live that dream, we risk destroying any forward technological development. Businesses don't invent new ways to do things, people do. And 90% of the improvements in cars come from racing and other motorsports pushing the limits and trying new things and finding better ways to do things.

There are very, very few race cars and monster trucks in the whole world compared to the millions of regular cars and trucks. Hardly anything to be concerned with as to its eco-friendliness.

Besides; you have to remember, this truck burns 100% Methanol, so he is burning a renewable fuel. So this "waste of resources" is actually MORE eco friendly than 99.9% of vehicles on the road!

It turns out that Methanol and Ethanol are more powerful per gallon than fossil fuels. So race cars, super cars, muscle cars and street tuners are all turning to this renewable fuel because its better for the engines, better for the planet and makes more horse power more safely.

Eric Bear Nyhof
6th September, 2011 @ 09:51 am PDT

Re Eric Bear Nyhof

Neither Methanol or Ethanol have as much energy per gallon as gasoline, and diesel is more energetic still. Methanol is mostly produced from natural gas, and the ease of storage and transfer make up for some of the energy loss of manufacturing it. (Being able to put a 20 liter can in the trunk makes up for a multitude of sins.) But Ethanol as a fuel is a disaster; it requires a huge energy input to produce, fertilizer, weed and pest control, fuel for the 'tractors', Water, and distillation. While AGW is statist nonsense, fermentation releases vast quantities of CO2. You then end up with a fuel that will carry you about 5/8 as far per liter as gasoline, and will require a new pipelines if you don't want to transport it by trucks.

Slowburn
6th September, 2011 @ 11:11 am PDT

...and what is the point of this thing?

Theo Viljoen
6th September, 2011 @ 01:31 pm PDT

Liberals like Alien live for moments like this - to puff up with sanctimony and tsk tsk at we poor stupid philistines.

But he doesn't understand that the joke is on him; this vehicle was made out of humor to poke fun at Eco-Bots and their miserable, negative view of the world.

Todd Dunning
6th September, 2011 @ 02:26 pm PDT

@Theo Viljoen

The point is to prove it can be done. To learn and generate new ideas that eventually benefit humanity as a whole. Many very useful inventions came from crazy guys doing things just because they can.

Why climb Mt Everest, why go to space? What is the point.

Why Sky-diving, why even a beach walk?

Because it is enjoyable and fun. It makes life worth living. That is why.

Paul van Dinther
6th September, 2011 @ 04:45 pm PDT

@EBN, TD and PvD -

OK so monster trucks are great because we owe ourselves a little fun by using 20% fewer resources. When did that happen? I think I would've noticed a drop in resource consumption of that magnitude. Or is it so that puffed-up, sanctimonious people have something to rail against? Really, as if there aren't enough serious issues to get fired up about. Oh, so it's to prove it can be done, to benefit humanity as a whole. Huh? So the two-thirds of humanity that don't have clean water or sufficient shelter will thank you for the creation of the monster truck? Gimme a break! Technically, monster trucks could've been built in the 1940's or 50's. Building them now only proves how backward many people are, not how advanced.

johnniesazzler
6th September, 2011 @ 06:56 pm PDT

I was about to say only in America, like Nascar and then reread the article, I agree Theo, it serves no purpose other than entertainment for the mass of MORONS on this planet, a waste, why not just put a stick of dynamite in a gallon of gasoline, for the yahoos to awe at, and Paul, sad that you can't see the difference between having fun in the natural world that you touched with you comment and this crap, sigh,, enngh

Bill Bennett
6th September, 2011 @ 08:18 pm PDT

Yards per Gallon???? Why not foot per drop? English measure are so funny!

Francesco Ferrara
6th September, 2011 @ 11:42 pm PDT

Correct that most methanol comes from Natural Gas (steam reforming), this is also a much more efficient way to make Ethanol.

Methanol can be made by fermentation of biomass (called wood alcohol for a reason) as can ethanol (fermenting sugars). BUT making seriously industrial quantities are not economical.... Hence the AGW provides a way for Uneconomical non solutions to be proposed and funded by the bleating sheep.

Hey, why havn't they forces Oil companies to stop flaring the vital resources they pass up the stack every day.... would the term economics have anything to do with this... Economics still drive the world NOW green issues... Someone has to pay for it all.

Great toy, waste of everything but fun for the spectators, and the Boys playing with it

MD
7th September, 2011 @ 01:17 am PDT

What is the purpose of this thing? Really? It's cool, fun, and entertaining. Maybe people will take their kids to a show and spend quality time as a family. Maybe a small child will look at it with that amazement that only a small child has. I think that's what is important. I couldn't care less about dwindling resources when you examine them on this scale...it's ONE vehicle. Whether it gets 50 m.p.g. or 50 g.p.m really has no effect on the global scale. I think some people are just totally absorbed by what is important to themselves and never stop to think about what other people may value.

chomper
7th September, 2011 @ 10:24 am PDT

What? No whale penis leather interior? Is there no limit to the macho posturing?

On the other hand, why should Texas have a monopoly on pointless bravado? Now Euro-peons can gawk and pretend to be just as unsophisticated as we Yanks. Apparently, they can't wait to get there.

Todd, quit labeling everything you don't like as "liberal". Sure, you find anything that harks back to the good old days of ICE as "fun". It doesn't change the obvious scrotum holding mindset that can't get enough of giant vehicles with a long pole that shoots things.

Bring back the cod piece!

fleming
7th September, 2011 @ 01:41 pm PDT

How come a Ford Truck has a Chevy engine in it?

Vince
7th September, 2011 @ 03:02 pm PDT

Why make movies?

What's their carbon footprint?

What's their waste level?

Movies like Waterworld could have left befind a floating or underwater city instead of just doing Mad Max on the water.

How much carbon does one major sports event generate?

I don't know but whining about it is not likely to get the

the masses to change very much.

Nagging won't help things much.

Griffin
8th September, 2011 @ 08:59 am PDT

Re; Alien - September 6, 2011 @ 07:41 am PDT

The dwindling supply of bronze forced the Romans to master the use of iron.

The dwindling forests forced industry to burn coal and build iron ships.

If you want to stop the use of coal and oil quickly champion nuclear power. The waste left after reprocessing can be disposed of by neutron bombardment until all that is left is short half-life elements that decay into non-radioactive elements. You even stand a fair chance of getting commercial quantities of rare elements.

Slowburn
8th September, 2011 @ 01:02 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,888 articles
Recent popular articles in Automotive
Product Comparisons