Talk about a room with a view... But doesnt everyone want to live (not to mention sleep) somewhere permeated with a rhythmic basso profundo whumping sound?
I know I do.... NOT!
18th July, 2013 @ 8:41 a.m. (California Time)
This sounds like the modern day equivalent of the light-house keeper. It would be great except for a few minor problems. First, if it's off-shore, wouldn't it be kind of hard to entertain guests or even grab a quart of milk when you needed it? Second, the noise from the gears and generator would be horrible. Third, image search Google for "wind turbine fire" and see what happens when things go wrong. Not a pretty picture.
18th July, 2013 @ 8:48 a.m. (California Time)
It is like the modern version of light house keepers. Some of them were isolated and have a similar problem getting to and from it plus getting supplies.
Perhaps instead of a permament residence, perhaps for emergencies and as a work shop to repair items that need maintanence.
18th July, 2013 @ 9:24 a.m. (California Time)
Interesting concept. Now take a moment and goto amazon to look at any review for any air conditioner. The first and primary complaint about any of them, the noise level. Now consider richer, pickier people being sold high end apartments with a MW generator strapped to the wall instead of a kw motor.
you'd have to sound isolate the entire structure away from the rest of the pylon. It would be incredibly expensive just with that addition.
18th July, 2013 @ 10:26 a.m. (California Time)
If the noise, safety, and supply factors could be addressed, this could actually be a pretty good idea.
18th July, 2013 @ 10:50 a.m. (California Time)
Just because it might be a grand idea to put a wind turbine on top of a house, does not mean that the reverse is true.
18th July, 2013 @ 12:28 p.m. (California Time)
If they used the apartments as the homes for the , co-op mentality, maintenance crew, instead of the uber-rich ..... I think it has promise.
The noise and vibrations would make it useless as a luxury dwelling, but as free housing with infinite free electric for a mildly trained worker(s), it could totally work.
18th July, 2013 @ 2 p.m. (California Time)
I love the idea save one concern - how much EMR would the inhabitants be exposed to? Would living only a few meters from an enormous generator also cause problems for cell reception, wifi, etc?
My understanding is many (all?) turbine towers have an elevator for generator room and turbine access. In the event of a fire, I guess one could set up a hasty rappel? BASE jump? Cool escape pod launcher? How about a slide that spirals it's way down around the tower?
18th July, 2013 @ 2 p.m. (California Time)
Aerodynamically It is a stupid place for the apartment. The back side of the tower rotating with the wind would work much better.
For people that don't throw a hissyfit every time something annoys them repetitive sounds cease to bother them. Even things like being under an airports takeoff route.
The big thing is that the wind turbines do not need onsite supervision you can monitor their operations from half way around the world if you wanted to. Once the wind farm gets big enough it is a full time job to do routine maintenance single turbines do not require it.
Given the health risks real and imagined it would be better to have the worker live on a boat.
19th July, 2013 @ 2:29 a.m. (California Time)
"........ It's a charming idea, but ..... an extremely improbable one. "
How is it improbable? Wind farms are on the rise in size and numbers. The size of each turbine unit is increasing, What do you expect or fore see in terms of surveillance and maintenance of equipment?
The crews will have to posted on long term basis, on lines similar to offshore drilling rigs in oil industry. And hence the need for suitable living-working quarters!
If not at turbine height then at sea level. Which ever is feasible and suitable as per the topography of the site in question!
19th July, 2013 @ 5:28 a.m. (California Time)
Western Governments will eventually tire of these 'toys', the subsidies will be removed and all wind farms will be abandoned and rapidly fall into disrepair. Do you really want to live on a politicians fantasy?
19th July, 2013 @ 12:57 p.m. (California Time)
Amazing, by literally filling the "eye of the cyclone", you would not ear higher sound level than the constant sea wind. But the sound from adjacent windmill is probably going to make your life very miserable, not to mention the noise and vibrations from gearbox and generator. Also, transport is going to be a problem, especially during storm.
19th July, 2013 @ 2:39 p.m. (California Time)
"...living space doubling as the rotor hub of the turbine."
The hub is the bit in the middle to which the blades are attached. It goes round and round. An apartment tumbling like a clothes dryer would not be very livable. ;-)
The image depicts living on top of the generator housing, a considerably different location than the rotor hub.
That line of the article makes as much sense as recent news articles about cats and dogs surviving long trips in car engines. Not engine compartments, the articles stated in the headline and body that the animals were in the engine.
20th July, 2013 @ 2:32 p.m. (California Time)
I think these people need to get a bit more in touch with the real world. I know this is sacrilege for architects, but... maybe talk to engineers a lil bit more?
This project is so out of touch with the real world in so many ways (engineering, safety, practicality, living quality -both in terms of sound pollution and energy interference with the human system-).
21st July, 2013 @ 1:17 p.m. (California Time)
why put the living quarters on the top, exposed to high winds, rotor noise etc?
Wouldn't it make sense to put the quarters nearer to the base, just high enough to avoid wave/sea damage?
This would also facilitate a 'crew' being able to move from turbine to turbine in good weather and maintain a group of turbines rather than a single one - more cost effective?
22nd July, 2013 @ 3:28 a.m. (California Time)
Just like in the old days when they had lighthouse keepers, in the future society we could have windmill and other energy device caretakers. The caretakers would receive free room and board for their services of maintaining the unit. The Star Trek fans are familar with the Federation's policy of doing productive work for society. The return is a non-pay and money free society. A society were people look out for each other instead of always trying to kill one another. Having a world order that provides for people by meeting all their requirements in return for fullfilling a task that needs to be done sounds much better than the greedy capitalistic system that we have.
22nd July, 2013 @ 8:18 a.m. (California Time)
Might be better to locate the loft underneath with a view of the ocean floor converted into a marine sanctuary.
22nd July, 2013 @ 5 p.m. (California Time)
The structure sways and there is no plumbing, inclusive with that is that there is no market for luxury dwellings at sea, several forts have been offered for conversion but ended up as B&B hotels after decades of being on the market. The sort of people who can afford a luxury million dollar home at sea spend the money on a yacht, rather than an address they cannot take with them. This is lost on architects looking for a concept to capture the publics imagination, but of course its gets publicity and the design studio is in the headlines so everyone is happy - bar the unpaid builders.
23rd July, 2013 @ 8:37 a.m. (California Time)