Decision time? Check out our latest product comparisons

Millimeter-scale, energy-harvesting sensor could operate almost perpetually

By

February 9, 2010

A low-power sensor system developed at the University of Michigan is 1,000 times smaller t...

A low-power sensor system developed at the University of Michigan is 1,000 times smaller than comparable commercial counterparts. It could enable new biomedical implants. Photo (Daeyeon Kim)

Researchers have developed a solar-powered sensor system that is just nine cubic millimeters in size. It is 1,000 times smaller than comparable commercial counterparts and can harvest energy from its surroundings to operate nearly perpetually. The system could enable new biomedical implants as well as building and bridge-monitoring devices. It could also vastly improve the efficiency and cost of current environmental sensor networks designed to detect movement or track air and water quality.

Developed at the University of Michigan the system’s industry-standard ARM Cortex-M3 processor, solar cells and battery are all contained on its tiny frame, which measures 2.5 x 3.5 x 1mm. The engineers say successful use of an ARM processor - the industry’s most popular 32-bit processor architecture - is an important step toward commercial adoption of this technology.

“The ARM Cortex-M3 processor has been widely adopted throughout the microcontroller industry for its low-power, energy efficient features such as deep sleep mode and wake-upinterrupt controller, which enables the core to be placed in ultra-low leakage mode, returning to fully active mode almost instantaneously,” said Eric Schorn, vice president, marketing, processor division, ARM. “This implementation of the processor exploits all of those features to the maximum to achieve an ultra-low-power operation.”

The sensor spends most of its time in sleep mode, waking briefly every few minutes to take measurements. Its total average power consumption is less than one nanowatt, which is one-billionth of a watt.

“Our system can run nearly perpetually if periodically exposed to reasonable lighting conditions, even indoors,” said David Blaauw, an electrical and computer engineering professor. “Its only limiting factor is battery wear-out, but the battery would last many years.”

The developers say the key innovation is their method for managing power. The processor only needs about 0.5V to operate, but its low-voltage, thin-film Cymbet battery puts out close to 4V. The voltage, which is essentially the pressure of the electric current, must be reduced for the system to function most efficiently.

“If we used traditional methods, the voltage conversion process would have consumed many times more power than the processor itself uses,” said Dennis Sylvester, an associate professor in electrical and computer engineering.

One way the U-M engineers made the voltage conversion more efficient is by slowing the power management unit’s clock when the processor’s load is light.

The designers are working with doctors on potential medical applications. The system could enable less-invasive ways to monitor pressure changes in the eyes, brain, and in tumors in patients with glaucoma, head trauma, or cancer. In the body, the sensor could conceivably harvest energy from movement or heat, rather than light, the engineers say.

About the Author
Darren Quick Darren's love of technology started in primary school with a Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong (still functioning) and a Commodore VIC 20 computer (not still functioning). In high school he upgraded to a 286 PC, and he's been following Moore's law ever since. This love of technology continued through a number of university courses and crappy jobs until 2008, when his interests found a home at Gizmag.   All articles by Darren Quick
3 Comments

I am sorry to be picky, but our language get mangled enough without using inverse comparisons. Something can not be "1000 times smaller". The word 'times' implies a multiplier. Something can be 1000 times bigger, but if you want to compare something that is smaller, the correct comparison is 1/1000 the size. See how that works? You divide to get smaller, you multiply to get bigger.

EE_Tim
10th February, 2010 @ 05:14 pm PST

Oh thank goodnes I am not the only person to spot this basic mistake that so many writers utilise every day !....similarly 20 times lighter, 10 times cheaper etc.etc.

While we are on basic mistakes made all the time, how about the ridiculous notion of numbering real objects starting with zero. Obviously few people were listening to the part about the abstract mathematical concept of zero being conceived in India centuries ago.

Have you ever tried counting your children "this is zero, one and two" , so which was the second child to be born? number 2? oops no, it must be number 1 but that doesn't sound right. Or "have you met my zero'th wife?" or "ours is the first house on the street so of course it is number "0". Wake up people, especially engineers who really have no excuse at all !

professore
11th February, 2010 @ 02:28 pm PST

When did the millennium start? 2000, or 2001? I go for 2001.

If the battery in this gadget gives out 4volts, but they only require .5v to operate, why not have a smaller battery?

windykites1
15th February, 2010 @ 10:13 am PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,987 articles