NASA's "Mighty Eagle" targets asteroid or Mercury landings


August 16, 2012

Mighty Eagle during its successful test flight (Photo: NASA/MSFC)

Mighty Eagle during its successful test flight (Photo: NASA/MSFC)

Image Gallery (5 images)

The crash of NASA’s Morpheus lander was an unfortunate setback, but like any good space pioneer, the agency has more than one string to its bow - and more than one lander in the hanger. On August 8, NASA’s prototype “Mighty Eagle” autonomous lander carried out the latest in a series of flight tests at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Though smaller than Morpheus and much less powerful, the craft is being used to develop a new class of autonomous robotic landers to explore the airless bodies of the Solar System from the planet Mercury to the moons of Jupiter.

Mighty Eagle is a testbed for developing autonomous systems that could make landings on airless bodies, such as the Moon, where parachutes can’t be used. The last tests of Mighty Eagle were carried out in 2011. The current series is to conduct flight testing of improved autonomous guidance control systems. During the tests the lander will fly and hover at altitudes between 30 feet (9.14 m) and 100 feet (30.48 m) as well as traversing sideways and landing.

The chances of Mighty Eagle sharing the fate of Morpheus are remote. Where Morpheus was loaded with volatile fuel for its rocket engines, Mighty Eagle is a Warm Gas Test Article (WGTA). That means it uses 90 percent hydrogen peroxide as fuel. It’s the same system as that in James Bond rocket belts used at sporting events and other public exhibitions.

Mighty Eagle’s engines are, in fact, steam rockets. The hydrogen peroxide passes over a catalyst and breaks down into steam and oxygen, pushing the three-legged lander’s 700 pound (317.5 kg) into the air under command of its onboard computer. There’s not flame, so this is much safer for test purposes. It allows for much faster turnarounds between flights and simplifies engineering because hydrogen peroxide isn’t as corrosive as other fuels, so stainless steel can be used in the engines.

Because the waste products are water and oxygen, it’s also very green.

The previous version of Mighty Eagle, the Cold Gas Test Article (CGTA), used compressed air, which was even safer, but only allowed flights of a few seconds as opposed to Mighty Eagle’s several minutes.

Mighty Eagle isn’t a very large craft. Standing 4 feet (1.21 m) tall and 8 feet (2.43 m) in diameter, it’s only about the size of a golf cart. However, it is able to carry out a complete flight from liftoff to landing with its computer controlling its thrusters and the cameras processing live video feeds for autonomous navigation.

Airless bodies of the Solar System that could be explored using this technology include our own Moon, Mercury, the asteroids and the moons of the outer planets.

Prospective missions include a lunar polar landing to look for the presence of water, carbon dioxide, methane and ammonia in the ever-shadowed craters there; scouting sites for future manned landings; studying the far side of the Moon and conducting sample return missions.

The current series of tests will continue through September.

The video below shows Mighty Eagle's flight test.

Source: NASA

About the Author
David Szondy David Szondy is a freelance writer based in Monroe, Washington. An award-winning playwright, he has contributed to Charged and iQ magazine and is the author of the website Tales of Future Past. All articles by David Szondy

The warm gas system could fairly easily be converted to a hybrid rocket by just adding the solid fuel portion just in front of the nozzles.


Why not just contract with Armadillo Aerospace who have had a lot of success with their lander?


With a name like Mighty Eagle it should have this on it somewhere.

Gregg Eshelman

You do realise that Hydrogen-peroxide is an organic acid that will eat your skin and muscles away? Known in Germany during WW2 as Z-stuff, using silver as a catalyst and used for powering the turbo pumps in the V-2rocket. Also used in the Messerschmitt Me 163. Yes the end result of the chemical reaction is ok, but the fuelling of the thing is really dangerous. So is it really that much better than more thermo based fuels?

Toffe Kaal

re; Toffe Kaal

Yes it is. All that is required to make it harmless to beneficial is a stream of water.

Post a Comment

Login with your Gizmag account:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our articles