Top 100: The most desirable cars of all time

Microphone system maps rooms with a snap of the fingers

By

June 19, 2013

EPFL's system in use at the Lausanne Cathedral in Switzerland

EPFL's system in use at the Lausanne Cathedral in Switzerland

Image Gallery (2 images)

Creating a 3D map of a room could someday be as simple as randomly placing four microphones within the space, then snapping your fingers. Researchers from Switzerland’s EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne/Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) have recently done so on a limited scale, and are now excited about the technology’s possible applications.

A team led by Prof. Martin Vetterli developed the technique, in which a computer algorithm analyzes and compares the sounds (such as finger snaps) picked up by four microphones – it doesn’t matter where in the room those microphones are placed.

For each mic, the computer is able to differentiate between a sound as it’s initially received directly from its source, and echoes of that sound picked up even just a fraction of a second later. By analyzing the lag between the initial sound and its echo, and by comparing the length of the lags measured at each microphone (keeping in mind the mics’ locations relative to one another), the computer can accurately calculate how far away the walls are in all directions.

The algorithm can also tell the difference between echoes rebounding off walls for the first or second time, and can establish a unique echo “signature” for each wall.

The system can tell the difference between echoes rebounding off walls for the first or se...

The system was first tested in a simple empty room, one wall of which could be moved back and forth, and it consistently mapped the room to within one millimeter of its actual dimensions. It was then tried in a more complex environment, an alcove within the Lausanne Cathedral (above), where it was said to deliver “good partial results.” The researchers believe that further tests using more microphones will prove more successful.

It is now hoped that once perfected, the technology could be used in architecture, forensics, or as an indoor navigational tool on smartphones. Police might even be able to use it to map the room that a mobile call is originating from, if the caller wanders around the room as they’re talking.

Source: EPFL

About the Author
Ben Coxworth An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away.   All articles by Ben Coxworth
Tags
6 Comments

I've considered this concept for some time, and on paper it can work as indicated. Would be very interested to see how the reconstructed room looks like, and what kind of microphones work best.

The only obvious limitation is how quiet you can make the room when undertaking this survey. The church is a nice example, as is a library perhaps.

Don't think you could image a train station or busy area easily.

...unless you move to the upper audible frequency band 13-15kHz, and send a specific range of pulsed tones from at least two sources within the area being surveyed.

May not have to be much louder than 80-90 dB as most crowd noise is in a lower band. Might get a dirty look from the odd dog or bird in the area, but a small price to pay :)

Nairda
19th June, 2013 @ 05:57 pm PDT

"Police might even be able to use it to map the room that a mobile call is originating from" Police has enough power as is - does not need that capability. I don't know why science always thinks of giving more power to the government. It already has too much power, stop being such good servants handing over shepard tools to your keeper...

GoodLife03
19th June, 2013 @ 08:38 pm PDT

How is this different from amplifiers that use those multi-mics in the middle of a room to draw the room's acoustic's signature? I'm thinking here about a lot of $2,000 amplifiers do this. Maybe I missed it but it's another way to calculate the acoustic signature?

33Nick
20th June, 2013 @ 09:35 am PDT

33Nick, could you enumerate a few such amplifiers?

DonGateley
20th June, 2013 @ 11:11 am PDT

@33Nick - Acoustic response is similar, but the captured data is precisely what you state: the acoustic signature: the timing/delay, frequency and stereo or quad positioning of the returned signals - the actual size of the room is not important, just the timing, frequency, and stereo/quad image positioning. However, in the case of 3D measurement, yes, the same principle, but the data sought is of from what direction, distance, and angle are the reflections coming from. Of course, this is computed as accurately as possible from the acoustic data.

I don't think they will ever get the accuracy that they desire from echoes only. However, the echoes PLUS a stereo photo or two, or the echoes PLUS a photo of a laser scan or two will probably give amazing results.

kalqlate
20th June, 2013 @ 11:59 am PDT

Dolphins do this already. Whales and probably Bats, too. Oceanographers, Geologists and paleontologists also use a similar technique to create 3D maps of the planet, rock strata, oil fields, caves, fossil skeletons, and the sea floor miles below the surface.

It's a terrific way to extend human sensory capabilities and the more we can simplify and improve the process of improving our ability to sense the world, the better. Who knows, one day we might all have the insight of a bat.

Richard Chesher
20th June, 2013 @ 02:33 pm PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,852 articles
Recent popular articles in Science
Product Comparisons