Sports car-inspired design aims to bring hovercraft into the 21st century
By Darren Quick
August 1, 2012
The Mercier-Jones hovercraft design was inspired by luxury sports cars
Image Gallery (12 images)Frustrated with what they see as stagnation in the evolution of hovercraft design over recent decades, cousins Michael Mercier and Chris Jones have teamed up in an effort to bring the personal hovercraft into the 21st century. As well as a futuristic, streamlined look inspired by high-end sports cars, the Mercier-Jones concept also purports to be quieter, easier to maneuver, and more environmentally friendly than existing craft.
Maneuverability – or lack thereof – has always been one of the big downsides of hovercraft, but the Mercier-Jones team claim their patent-pending directional control system will enable steering and braking ability similar to that of a car. The front, side-mounted fans are said to provide fine tuned control in forward, lateral and reverse directions, with independent control over each side enabling advanced maneuvering capabilities.
Taking inspiration from the marine, automotive and aerospace industries, the hovercraft will be constructed using lightweight materials including carbon fiber, aluminum, fiberglass and marine plywood. But by using existing technologies and fabrication methods, they aim to price their entry-level hovercraft at under US$20,000.
The craft would be a hybrid, powered by a gasoline engine and electric motor, the latter increasing efficiency and reducing air and noise pollution levels so that it could be piloted without the need for earplugs.
To raise funds to allow them to construct and test a number of prototypes, Mercier and Jones have turned to crowd-funding site indiegogo, where pledges range from $1, which will entitle you to a ride in one of the first hovercraft, up to $15,000, which will secure (one of three) pre-production models. They are hoping to raise $50,000 by August 22, but the project is off to a slow start with just over $1,000 pledged at the time of publication.
If things gather momentum and they reach their goal, Mercier and Jones plan to have the hovercraft built and test flights underway by May 2013.
The Mercier-Jones video pitch can be viewed below.
Source: Mercier-Jones, indiegogo
Darren's love of technology started in primary school with a Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong (still functioning) and a Commodore VIC 20 computer (not still functioning). In high school he upgraded to a 286 PC, and he's been following Moore's law ever since. This love of technology continued through a number of university courses and crappy jobs until 2008, when his interests found a home at Gizmag. All articles by Darren Quick
Useless unless on water as the dirt spray will just come up and into the cockpit and onto anyone standing within 30-50 or so feet!!
And try to move one of these on water without the air lift and likely ruin it as the drag is so high.
I built a fairly good one with a very experienced hovercrafter/builder and was surprised how useless they were except the few places where they shine like swamps, shallow water, etc little else can go.
What we really need are ground effect trains and Wing In Ground Effect/WIGE/WIG flying boats.
jerryd1st August, 2012 @ 07:41 am PDT
Sounds about as likely as this other pie-in-the-sky concept.
http://news.discovery.com/autos/vw-hovercraft-brings-us-one-step-closer-to-the-jetsons-110615.html
I suspect the two boys are being a little naive. There are any number of small personal hovercraft and In-Ground-Effect craft available, most already proven and in operation. Still, good luck to them, specially if they can do it for $20k!
Mike Hallett1st August, 2012 @ 08:49 am PDT
not sure where the hate is coming from.
A: it has a cushion. This keeps spray and dirt from coming up into the cockpit. Proven tech, been done for a LONG time. LCAC's give a bit of spray, but then they're hundreds of tons and need a LOT of air inflating their cushion. . . for small ones, not so much.
B: a hybrid means the electric motors will run at need. It looks (from sketches and pics) like the main hover-prop is powered by the motor and the maneuvering props are run by electrics. It looks like a nice idea.
I've seen them on grass, pavement, dry lake beds (sand), etc. and they go well. Their main problem is maneuverability - which this is trying to address. . .
socalboomer1st August, 2012 @ 10:50 am PDT
First insurmountable problem... sudden stops. Every car needs to be able to stop in a hurry. Turning is an issue too.
warren52nz1st August, 2012 @ 01:43 pm PDT
@warren52nz Where's the brake pedal on my boat then?
christopher1st August, 2012 @ 07:31 pm PDT
This could work but not with any electrics which require at least 4 car size battery's for twin 28 Lb electric motors (e-Tec) Plus the generator of equal or more hp output than the motors! Electrics on flying things are a non starter for any useful range because of the weight penalty. If it was all gas motors it might work with very highly loaded props, but like all hovercraft the prop noise will make it unacceptable near populated areas. It should be outlawed to promote any untried prop designed craft as "Quieter" when they have offered no reason for that attribute. When the noise problem is solved Hovercraft will become popular and sales will drive innovative designs.
David Carambat1st August, 2012 @ 08:46 pm PDT
Make it look like a Star Wars landspeeder and they'll have a bunch of orders.
Gregg Eshelman1st August, 2012 @ 09:30 pm PDT
Looks good, great idea, the only change I would make is to have a vertical fan in the back. Make it variable pitch so it could increase both forward speed and, reverse thrust for slowing down faster.
Billy Brooks1st August, 2012 @ 10:00 pm PDT
re; warren52nz
Deflate the cushion. screeeeech.
Slowburn2nd August, 2012 @ 12:30 am PDT
christopher - August 1, 2012 @ 07:31 pm PDT
said @warren52nz "Where's the brake pedal on my boat then?.."
Very good point Christopher.
Just use the same approach as on the boat - throw out the anchor!
Mark Eastaugh2nd August, 2012 @ 04:13 am PDT
nice video and design. however, none of the tech. is new and therefore not patent material. as with any car or boat model it can be copyrighted though. seriously, ducted fans and thrust vectoring have been around for so long a patent application is laughable. i think they got most of their ideas from RC craft and R. Q. Riley designs. it's only the exterior design that is unique. but nice job on that. it seems a lot of new high-end marine performance designs are trying to incorporate sports car styling and such. very bond-ish! nice, i think. :)
Joe M. Wesson2nd August, 2012 @ 05:34 am PDT
At the price a good investment for the first generation they will hold their first issue status in the future and appreciate in value. With the improvements to follow this looks like a foundational car company for the 21st century. Ground floor opportunities are rare and this tech will take in the rebuilt and redesigned cities of this century. Do you see how quickly the cities of the world have adopted latest tech and transformed their appearance and complexity overnight? This one looks like a winner
Anton Christopher McInerney2nd August, 2012 @ 07:13 pm PDT
I smell a scam. Just watch the video. If these guys are engineers trying to build a better hovercraft, the terrible editing quality of their video suggest poor technical skills, yet the infomercial style sales pitch was pretty good. Never trust a good sales man that lacks technical skills, unless you want to get conned.
AnOld BlackMarble3rd August, 2012 @ 11:13 am PDT
Great innovation for something so old and boring. I have to disagree with "AnOld BlackMarble" I think if the video were too flashy I would be more skeptical. Their expertise is not in video editing and cinematography its in engineering. Keep up the work hope to see one soon.
Mbizzle3rd August, 2012 @ 01:56 pm PDT
How can it be 'environmentally friendly' when the battery charger/generator still runs on gasoline and spews toxic fumes and still needs water polluting lubricating oil to run?
One gallon of motor oil can contaminate one MILLION gallons of water.
And chemical batteries? They're toxic, from manufacturing down to the recycling processes which takes a lot more energy for them to be produced in the first place and the ones fits this particular application can explode.
With this kind of hybrid you get the the ineffiency and weight penalty of an infernal combustion engine PLUS the low energy density storage and chemical ineffiency of batteries. Great. Unfortunately these people haven't done any thorough research using Google so I wouldn't give them serious thoughts of ever succeeding.
SpaceBagels3rd August, 2012 @ 07:18 pm PDT
Terrific proposal !! I admire your efforts, You are
however slightly behind Moller progress but the
hovercraft is undoubtably coming. Call it:
The Wheeless Automobile. I prefer the
SEV format with enough thrust and lifting
surfaces, to actually fly out of ground effect.
At speed, it may be able to hold a 3D lane,
and most likely, that regulatory infrastructure
would be available to military and LE only at first.
I envision a 400K price tag when/if such could
be offered to the public.
Mitch Slagghorn8th August, 2012 @ 09:00 pm PDT
@David, The noise could be countered using destructive wave technology
Mitch Slagghorn8th August, 2012 @ 09:36 pm PDT
Thanks for the article, Darren! I really appreciate you taking the time to understand our design and share it with the web. And thanks to everyone for your comments and feedback (positive and negative). The Mercier-Jones hovercraft is going to be a reality, and we are hoping to make it available to everyone as soon as next summer. As builds and testing progress, you will see how incredible this vehicle really is. Its going to be awesome!
Mike Mercier13th August, 2012 @ 08:07 am PDT
Please keep me in informed of progress, are you looking for investors?
Martin Brook19th October, 2012 @ 11:23 pm PDT
Hi Martin Brook,
We are still looking for investors. Please e-mail me at info@mercier-jones.com and visit mercier-jones.com for more information.
-Michael Mercier
CEO and Co-founder, Mercier-Jones
Mike Mercier29th October, 2012 @ 12:30 pm PDT
Or Login with Facebook:
Just enter your friends and your email address into the form below
For multiple addresses, separate each with a comma
Privacy is safe with us because we have a strict privacy policy.






I fail to see how an electromotive system will be more efficient than just having the engine turning the properly sized blowers directly.
The propulsion system doesn't look efficient at all.
Slowburn1st August, 2012 @ 01:23 am PDT