Decision time? Check out our latest product comparisons

MIT researchers devise technique to clean up oil spills using magnets

By

September 12, 2012

The oil and water separation technique uses permanent magnets immersed in a reservoir cont...

The oil and water separation technique uses permanent magnets immersed in a reservoir containing oil and water

Possibly the only good thing to come out of the Deepwater Horizon disaster is the subsequent increase in research into finding more effective ways to cle_n up oil spills, including such initiatives as the X PRIZE Foundation's Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X CHALLENGE. Joining the list is a new method devised by researchers at MIT who propose separating oil and water using magnets. The new technique would allow the oil to be recovered to help offset the costs of the cleanup operation.

Oil isn’t magnetic, but suspending magnetic nanoparticles within the oil turns it into a magnetic liquid known as a ferrofluid. Previous research efforts using ferrofluids typically involved pumping a water-and-ferrofluid mixture through a channel with magnets on the outside directing the flow of the water one way and the flow of the ferrofluid another. However, this technique will work only if the concentration of the ferrofluid is known beforehand and remains constant – neither of which is possible in water contaminated by an oil spill.

For their approach, the MIT researchers made two modifications to the existing method. Instead of placing the magnets on the outside of the stream, they were immersed within it, and instead of being oriented parallel to the flow of the stream, they run perpendicular to it.

Because the magnetic field of the cylindrical permanent magnets used by the MIT team is strongest at its edges, the oil is attracted to the tips of the magnets much more strongly than the sides. And as the bottoms of the cylindrical magnets were embedded under the waterline in the base of a reservoir and the tops of the magnets were positioned above water level, the oil didn’t collect around them. Rather, it shot up the sides of the magnets to form beaded spheres at the top.

Shahriar Khushrushahi, a postdoc in MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and lead author on a paper describing the approach says the technique provides excellent separation between oil and water. Additionally, its simplicity makes it feasible for large scale manufacture and deployment at sea for days or weeks a a time, where electrical power and maintenance facilities are limited.

While the team is yet to determine the most practical way to remove the oil from the magnets in an actual oil-recovery system, in their experiments they used a Halbach array. This is a special arrangement of permanent magnets where the magnetic field on one side is augmented, while the magnetic field on the other side is canceled out to near zero. This allowed the oil in the reservoir to remain unattracted to the bottom of the array, while the oil attached to the magnets was pulled off by the top of the array.

The team says that adding magnetic nanoparticles to oil mixed with water to produce a ferrofluid aboard a ship is not a challenge. Additionally, removing the nanoparticles can be achieved using a technique known as high-gradient magnetic separation. This has been done on a small scale and would allow the recovery of both the nanoparticles and the oil.

One remaining challenge is to determine how much water gets dissolved in the oil and the best way to remove it. “To our eye, you don’t see much moisture in there, but I’m sure that there is some moisture that adheres to it,” says team member Markus Zahn. “We might have to run it through multiple cycles.”

On a commercial scale, the magnetic separation method could be used in conjunction with existing oil recovery techniques such as skimming, which would perform an initial separation. The magnetic separation technique could then be used to finish the job.

The research team will present a paper detailing their work at the 13th International Conference on magnetic Fields (ICMF13) being held in New Delhi, India, in January 2013. The team has also filed two patents on its work.

MIT researchers Zahn and Khushrushahi explain the magnetic separation technique in the video below.

Source: MIT

About the Author
Darren Quick Darren's love of technology started in primary school with a Nintendo Game & Watch Donkey Kong (still functioning) and a Commodore VIC 20 computer (not still functioning). In high school he upgraded to a 286 PC, and he's been following Moore's law ever since. This love of technology continued through a number of university courses and crappy jobs until 2008, when his interests found a home at Gizmag.   All articles by Darren Quick
Tags
7 Comments

Obviously using permanent makes it energy efficient but...

How fast is it compared to centrifugal separation?

How much oil does this method leave in the discharge water compared to centrifugal separation?

How much do the magnetic nanoparticles cost and what percentage of them are recovered? Or how much does it cost compared to centrifugal separation?

What effect on the environment will the lost magnetic nanoparticles have?

It appears to me that there aught to be a point in which the captured oil mix could be sucked into a tube by a vacuum pump making for continues operation.

Pikeman
13th September, 2012 @ 02:36 am PDT

Here's what I would do. Use a series of electromagnets in a column that bends like a candy cane to pull the magnetized oil up out of the bath and into a catch basin. The electromagnets would turn on and off in sequence like chasing lights to create a sort of peristaltic wave. At a high enough rate, you wouldn't even see much of a wave, just a continuous flow of oil coming out of a bent pipe. Then, to separate the nano-particles from the oil, use a centrifuge. The particles could accumulate on a strip of paper media like in a Spinner II oil filter they put on some Diesel truck engines. The paper strip is taken out periodically and the particles are removed. Maybe a sponge like material could be used and then 95% of them wrung out instead. That would be pretty good efficiency, especially if the centrifuge contained a piston to squeeze the sponge after it was loaded up. Of course you'd need a bank of them all working at the same time, but cycling alternately.

Gearheaded Technoid

Expanded Viewpoint
13th September, 2012 @ 10:52 am PDT

Can we mass produce this & fwd deploy in key areas IE LA FL AL, Alaska for future spills??

Must replicate & produce

Stephen N Russell
13th September, 2012 @ 05:30 pm PDT

Kevin Costner's cetrifuge wasn't fast enough?

All they'd really need to use is a peice of pipe rigged as an airlift pump from the point of the leak to catch the biggest part of it right from the source of the leak.

Kwazai
14th September, 2012 @ 10:29 am PDT

I guess it's when they don't want to find or fix the leaks?

Kwazai
14th September, 2012 @ 10:29 am PDT

re; Kwazai

Your pump would only work in shallow water.

That black goo leaking out of the pipe is money it just looks like oil. With the possible exception of the BP, Deepwater Horizon spill they want to fix the leaks.

Pikeman
15th September, 2012 @ 03:04 am PDT

Expanded Viewpoint : ferrofluid isn't like that, as it stats its magnetic, if you had it on a try and put a magnet at one end the whole lot would react as the nano particals are so close together they pass the magnetism is pasted from one partical to another making it all act as one, a friend of my dads who worked for nasa invented it for replacement of rubber rings on space equipment, very fun to play with if your a bit geek like me

wilsonrowlands
18th September, 2012 @ 07:41 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,044 articles