Bad moon rising: Astronomers explain "full moon curse"


February 16, 2014

Lunar ranging laser pulse scattering off high terrestrial cloud during eclipse (Photo: NASA)

Lunar ranging laser pulse scattering off high terrestrial cloud during eclipse (Photo: NASA)

Image Gallery (5 images)

The full moon has long been associated with any number of superstitions. While links with lunacy, violence, fertility, disasters, and the stock market have been thoroughly debunked, the possibility of a causative role in some arenas still remains a possibility. A lunar ranging study carried out using reflectors has long contended with the "Full-Moon Curse", a near-total fading of reflected signals during the full Moon. This Curse is real, and has now been explained.

Lunar ranges have been collected for decades, most recently by astronomer Tom Murphy's group at UC San Diego, who is using these data to carry out a stringent test of general relativity. Lunar ranging works by sending laser pulses from the Earth to the Moon and back, timing the duration of the round trip.

The observations are now carried out using a 3.5 m (140 in) telescope at New Mexico's Apache Point Observatory. Twenty 532 nm laser pulses, each having an energy of 115 mJ and a duration of 100 ps, are directed each second through the telescope onto the lunar surface. The pulses then strike retroreflectors left on the Moon by Apollo astronauts and on a Soviet lunar rover. These optical prisms precisely direct reflected light back along the path on which it arrived; that is, back to the original telescope where their arrival is timed.

The time required for the round trip can be measured to within a few picoseconds, allowing the distance to the Moon to be measured with a precision of about a millimeter (0.04 in). The level of precision is remarkable, considering that only one photon, on average, is detected in each return pulse – roughly 1 in 100 quadrillion photons sent from the telescope to the Moon.

In short, a very difficult experiment is being carried out brilliantly. Then appeared the Full-Moon Curse. On the night of the full Moon, the strength of the returned signal drops roughly tenfold. Not just once; the drop follows the lunar phases month after month.

Photons don't just disappear. To avoid detection, they must either be absorbed or misdirected. Moon dust is an obvious source for absorbing material, and indeed the prism surface appears to be about 50 percent blocked by dust. However, its effect on the photon return signal is essentially constant, as there appears to be no reason why dust should accumulate every full Moon, just to disappear the next day.

The actual reason turns out to be a bit more subtle, and depends on a tiny design detail that no one considered. As shown in the image above of a lunar retroreflector on the Moon's surface, the prisms are inset rather deeply into the retroreflector's surface. This means that the Sun's rays only strike the surface of the prisms when the Sun is high in the lunar sky – when the Moon appears fully illuminated from Earth.

Lunar dust, on average, is rather dark, absorbing about 93 percent of the light that hits it. When the Moon is full, the Sun's light hits the dust on the surface of the prisms, which does not occur on other days because of the insetting of the prisms. As a result, the dust, and the very front layers of the retroreflector prisms, heat up on the day of the full Moon.

In response to the temperature gradient across the prisms, both the shape and the homogeneity of the glass from which the prisms are made are compromised. This thermal response has rather the same effect as placing a very weak lens on the front of the retroreflectors.

This lensing effect defocuses the otherwise parallel light that emerges from the retroreflectors, making the return spot size larger on the Earth's surface. The telescope, which is tiny compared to the area over which the laser photons are returned to the Earth, therefore sees a smaller proportion of those photons. This decrease is expected only during full Moon.

It's a nice idea, but rather difficult to prove without going to the Moon's surface and making measurements. Then Prof. Murphy had an idea. If the Sun's heat was distorting the retroreflectors at full Moon, all he had to arrange to test that was to turn off the Sun, and see if the signal comes back.

Although turning off the Sun is a bit tricky, it happens naturally on the Moon's surface when we see a lunar eclipse. At that point, the Earth blocks the Sun's light from striking the Moon. Naturally, all lunar eclipses occur at full Moon.

Murphy's team eventually had good conditions for lunar ranging during a lunar eclipse. During the five and a half hour duration of the eclipse (a lunar eclipse is far longer than a solar eclipse, essentially because the Earth is larger than the Moon), the team reflected pulses from all the lunar retroreflectors. Before the eclipse, they saw the usual tenfold reduction in signal. When the progress of the eclipse put each retroreflector into the dark in turn, the full return signal returned. Finally, when the Sun again shone on the lunar surface, the signals fell to their usual full Moon level.

While these observations remain something short of complete proof of the mechanism, it does appear to confirm the effect is driven by the Sun's heating of the lunar apparatus. While the lunar ranging Full-Moon Curse is now put to bed, it is an important reminder that just because something happens on a apparently supernatural schedule doesn't mean it can't be real.

Source: UC-San Diego

About the Author
Brian Dodson From an early age Brian wanted to become a scientist. He did, earning a Ph.D. in physics and embarking on an R&D career which has recently broken the 40th anniversary. What he didn't expect was that along the way he would become a patent agent, a rocket scientist, a gourmet cook, a biotech entrepreneur, an opera tenor and a science writer. All articles by Brian Dodson

Oh dear! Does this mean that the moon landings were not faked? Can it possibly be that the supposedly live TV stream believed to really be from a secret studio somewhere or other was actually from the surface of the moon, like NASA said it was? Wow! Who would have thought it?

Mel Tisdale

As someone who worked as a 911 dispatcher for over 12 years, and has worked around law enforcement, doctors, ER staff for over 20, the full moon thing is REAL. I don't know what it is, but 2 days before and 2-3 days after a full moon, the nuts really come out of the woodwork. You will get some of the strangest calls for service, during that period of the month.

Rusty Harris

"...thoroughly debunked..."

Ha ha ha! The wisdom of millennia disproved in a generation! Our kids are so smart!


This is essentially old news. I had a neighbor who worked in a psych ward and the patients would really get riled up during a full moon.

Ron Olson

How about if the sun is warming the 'plate' onto which the reflectors are attached and distorting it instead of or in addition to the lenses?


"The level of precision is remarkable, considering that only one photon, on average, is detected in each return pulse – roughly 1 in 100 quadrillion photons sent from the telescope to the Moon."

I think that number nay be incorrect The illustration in the articall indicates that 300x10^15 Photons leave in each Pulse and only 1 in 30x10^6 photons are reflected. It also states that only 1 in 30x10^6 photons in the returning pulses are detected. 300x10^15 / 30x10^6 = 10x10^9 Photons returned 10x10^9/30x10^6 = .3x10^3 or 3x10^2

It seems that the statement could be changed to 300 photons are returned roughly 1 in 10 quadrillion.

With only one photon per pulse returned I thing it would take a lot of averaging to determine if that photon was from the leading edge of the laser emission or the trailing edge. Also if the distance from the earth to the moon is found to vary this would make it even more difficult. At least with 300 photons and a 3mm wide pulse you could more easily get the accuracy down to 1mm or .04 in.

What I find really incredible about this article is that we can measure down to 1x10-12 seconds and not only that but generate light pulses that are 2cm long.

I just had look the this website that explains the experiment in a bit more detail. apparently there are other factors that effect the returning of photos so only 1-5 photons are actually detected from each pulse. The link also explains that the distance fro the earth to the moon does vary and some of the factors that they take into account when determining this value such as continental drift and weather systems pushing down on the crust of the earth. Fascinating


No need to explain anything one way or the other. Whatever is, is. Besides, it's fun to howl at the moon and have a reason.


how is that a curse?


@ SuperFool,

Blame the fables of werewolves and vampires.


There should be no mystery -

During a full moon you are gaining the full reflectivity of the sun off the Moon's surface. This equates to a massive reflection of photons, RFI, EMI, etc.... This will change the character of the test photons by injecting energy into them and diverting them through the intense noise.

Examples: 1) Look at a PC screen in the Dark - It is harsh on the eyes. Turn on a light somewhere in the vicinity and the PC screen light is diffused to be less harsh on your eyes. Why? The light is diminished by being diverted through the interference of the other light. 2) Try whispering in an empty room then doing the same in a room full of loud talking people. .

B. Stott

Don't worry people - you are still allowed to howl at the Moon whenever you want to! It is just more fun if you do it at the full Moon ... and the neighbourhood dogs all get to join in!

The Skud

I'd really like to see the evidence as to how the links between the Full Moon and lunacy and violence have been thoroughly debunked.

My anecdotal evidence is only anecdotal, but it is shared with a significant number of others who have been involved in medical and emergency services, over many years, and I'll need to see some solid evidence from science that explains why what I see isn't actually a fact.


In 40 years of retail I started to realise that consumers were seemingly more irritable during the full moon period. Then some 15 years ago in a conversation with Consumer Affairs they confirmed this as they see dramitic elevation of complainta about the full monn cycle. I continually observed this with interest and can testify that yes . the full moon brings out the worst in people as they have hightened agressive attitude to events and demonstrate more agressive behavoural responses to situations like appliance breakdowns and sundty non life threatening issues escalate to major minset dramas. Hey it's just a broken toaster not personal assault, house break or family tragedy, but at full moon they act like it is .

John Thirgood

Walk in the woods at night on a full moon it is very scary because now u can see. When u can see in the woods at night ur mind realizes "wow this is very dangerous" as compared to being in the woods on a night with less than a full moon. ur mind realizes yes it is scary but i cant see anything so ignorance is bliss. So on a full moon the reason people r more on edge is because they can can see that there r alot more dangers than r normally perceived, n this brings on the fight or flight response which is perceived by everyone as being agitated and more wary and well just strange. Strange because we dont usually get to see people in the flight or fight response mode.



when the photons did not return as expected some nut-job at th observatory accredited th non returning photons to the curse of th full moon. similar to my humor about th jelly donut rock on mars when i said "the locals put the jelly donut rock in front of th rover as an offering to th rover god".

Post a Comment

Login with your Gizmag account:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our articles