iPad review roundup


April 1, 2010

Saturday April 3 is almost upon us, but even though the iPad isn't officially out, the first reviews are starting to flood in. So what's the early verdict on of Apple's sleek new tablet device from those who've already spent quality time on its 9.7-inch multi-touch screen? Read on for a review round-up.

First to the New York Times, which identifies the opinion split between "techies" and "regular people" over what the iPad has to offer. For techies its a "gigantic iPod Touch", a very heavy Kindle with only 60,000 titles available at this stage that you can’t read well in direct sunlight. It's fast on the processor front but hard to type on, there's no USB ports, no camera, no multitasking and of course it can't run Flash. For regular consumers it's still a gigantic iPod Touch, but a very shiny one that changes the multi-touch experience. It's on offer without a contract and gives access to 150,000 existing iPhone apps as well as the fledgling iPad app store.

USA TODAY's Edward C. Baig, is aware of these deficiencies, but still thinks the iPad is a winner: "The iPad is not so much about what you can do - browse, do e-mail, play games, read e-books and more - but how you can do it." [USA TODAY]

Tim Gideon at PCMag believes the device "just makes sense," while Walter S. Mossberg goes as far as saying it has the potential to change portable computing profoundly: "My verdict is that, while it has compromises and drawbacks, the iPad can indeed replace a laptop for most data communication, content consumption and even limited content creation, a lot of the time. But it all depends on how you use your computer." [All Things Digital]

Is it just another tablet computer? If so, why all the fuss? Tablets haven't exactly conquered the portable computing landscape after all. The answer according to Andy Ihnatko is "that in fact, we haven’t seen tablets before. And maybe the iPad is the only true tablet we’ll get in 2010." [Chicago Sun Times]

While some see it as an "entirely new category of mobile device" [Techblog], others are no doubt still scratching their heads wondering what this thing is actually for.

Several reviewers point to the fact that it's about consuming media, not creating it. Gregor Berkowitz puts it nicely: "Online media is now a rich enough environment that there’s plenty of content to browse and consume. There’s also a hole that exists between the laptop and the cellphone. The gap is defined by an experience that’s optimized for content consumption, rather than creation. Or, to put it another way, an experience that’s built around sitting back, rather than leaning forward.

Are you one of the chosen few who will be getting your hands-on an iPad over the next week? If so, we'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments section.

And stay tuned for Gizmag's in-depth iPad review.


I\'d prefer an android tablet that multitasks and has flash like this:


I bought one yesterday. I like it, but it\'s not exactly what I hoped for. Just found out about the no USB port deal. Why? I don\'t get it, however, Apple does seem to have this dope-pusher tendency to string us along. The 2011 model will no doubt have a camera, the 2012 edition will have USB ports, and so on. Big disappoinment in the Word department. As far as I can see, there\'s no obvious way to open a doc that I e-mailed myself as an attachment. What to do, what to do??? The screen is glass and beautiful, it\'s definitely easier to type on than the iPhone, and there are some cute features in opening e-mail. The unit is elegant to hold and look at. The iPad had the potential to be life-altering, but falls far short.


I need to amend my previous posting. I have now figured out how to open, work on and send Word docs. It\'s all very well thought out. Moving between tasks has a wonderful and fluid logic.

Post a Comment

Login with your Gizmag account:

Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our articles