Highlights from the 2014 LA Auto Show

Fish oils fed to flatulent cows could reduce greenhouse gas emissions

By

April 6, 2009

Fish oils may reduce the methane released by cattle

Fish oils may reduce the methane released by cattle

April 6, 2009 Omega 3 fatty acids in fish oils have many documented benefits to humans including the reduction of cholesterol, but what of the benefits to animals and the environment in general? While assisting the heart and circulatory system in animals and improving the meat quality in cattle, it is also, according to researchers at the University College in Dublin, beneficial in reducing methane levels from flatulence when added to the diet of cattle.

Methane given off by farm animals is a major contributing factor to greenhouse gas levels emanating from the agricultural sector, prompting researchers at the University College in Dublin to conduct a study into adding fish oil to the feed of cattle. They have reported that by including 2% fish oil into the diet, a reduction in the amount of methane released by cattle through flatulence was achieved.

With over a third of all methane related emissions (amounting to 900 billion tonnes per year) attributed to methanogen bacteria that live in the digestive systems of cattle, sheep and goats, flatulence in animals becomes a serious matter. When calculated in volume, methane is a potent greenhouse gas; 20 times more powerful at trapping solar energy than carbon dioxide. According to Dr Lorraine Lillis, fish oil affects the methane-producing bacteria in the rumen part of the cow’s gut, leading to reduced emissions. Approximately 50% of methane emissions in Ireland are attributed to farm animals, and with the country being one of the six main producers of beef and veal in the European Union (EU), an alternative to placing a cap on stock numbers (a scenario that is a possibility) to reduce methane emissions could only be an advantage to the primary producer and the environment. It is yet to be stated by the University of Dublin the exact amount of the reduction of the methane released, is this measurable?

Dr Lillis states that the aim of the research could bring about a more targeted approach to reducing methane emissions in animals by understanding which microbial species are influenced by changes in diet and relating them to methane production. If this study results in implementing a dietary change to cattle that is viable and shows proven, significant methane emission reduction, then this could be another battle won in the very extensive war to reduce greenhouse emissions.

Anne Hanrahan

4 Comments

This article sums up the sad remainders of the corpse of Global Warming. Now that the body has cooled along with the weather, the hippies have only meager entrails left to hold up to the sky in a last gesture of defiance.

Pity the poor GW hoaxer. From your glory days of oceans rising up to consume the mainland by 2011 and endless dust storms blotting out the sun, how far you have fallen. Now there are only table scraps of grants left to study cow farts.

But all is not lost. The researchers at the University College in Dublin milked another year of research dollars out of the taxpayers. They can at least take their new Priuses to shop for Birkenstocks.

Todd Dunning
6th April, 2009 @ 09:28 am PDT

Removing fish from the ocean to feed cattle seems like a pretty reakless environmental act in the first place. Maybe flaxseed would be a better feedstock and the result would be much the same.

Hamish Robertson
6th April, 2009 @ 06:12 pm PDT

FISH OIL contains omega-3 fatty acids which have been instrumental in human health, but has also proven beneficial to the heart and circulatory systems of livestock animals as well.

http://gofishoil.com/kosher-fish-oil/

Facebook User
29th April, 2010 @ 06:59 pm PDT

Cattle emissions are a large gas source, but they're mostly from the front end due to how cattle process grass (burping up & chewing cud).

There are a variety of approaches, including changing the bacteria mix.

Grass-fed cattle's meat is more nutritious and less disease-ridden. See www.polyfarms.com

Animal waste is a large issue especially in the huge feed lots.

I'd expect the carbon footprint delta of grass-fed vice grain-fed would be significant.

Finally, there is lots of fruit and vegetable waste at food processing plants that could be fed to cattle, increasing their meat's nutrient value and removing more organic waste from the system.

cwolf88
11th August, 2010 @ 08:02 am PDT
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 29,558 articles
Recent popular articles in Environment
Comparison Reviews