Shopping? Check out our latest product comparisons

New tech lets air traffic systems tell the difference between airplanes and wind turbines

By

November 30, 2012

Unlike conventional air traffic control radar systems, the Holographic Radar system can re...

Unlike conventional air traffic control radar systems, the Holographic Radar system can reportedly differentiate between airplanes and spinning wind turbine blades (Photo: Shutterstock)

Wind farms and airports don’t mix. Unfortunately, when the blades are turning on wind turbines, the motion can interpreted as aircraft on air traffic control radar screens. Needless to say, the results of such confusion could potentially be catastrophic – or at the very least, they could make things much more stressful for already-frazzled air traffic controllers. UK tech firm Aveillant, however, claims that its Holographic Radar system is the solution to the problem.


According to Aveillant CEO David Crisp, the problem of “wind turbine clutter” has so far not been sufficiently addressed by anyone else.

“For the most part, airports are lodging planning objections to wind farm development in their vicinity on safety grounds,” he told us. “A handful of organizations are using blanking technologies, crude techniques to remove the wind farm returns, such as placing the radar behind a hill so that the wind turbines are out of sight. But such techniques are imprecise and leave unmonitored airspace so are not a long term solution to the problem.”

Conventional radar systems commonly used at airports rely on a rotating antenna, that sweeps a focused radar beam in a complete horizontal circle once every few seconds. By contrast, the Holographic Radar system utilizes a stationary array that receives radar signals from all directions, all the time.

Using those signals, it analyzes what is known as the Doppler phase shift, which relates to how moving objects reflect radio waves depending on their direction and velocity. By doing so, it is reportedly able to easily tell the difference between turbines and airplanes, and can pinpoint any turbines within 20 nautical miles (37 km) of the airport.

The idea is that Holographic Radar would be integrated into an airport’s existing radar system – not replace it. Since it would “know” where all the turbines in the area were, it could simply remove their radar returns from the air traffic control screens.

A development unit is currently reported to be performing well in a field trial, with more trials of a pre-production unit planned for the second quarter of next year.

Of course, some people might just suggest not building wind farms near airports. Crisp, however, thinks that won’t always be an option. “Until now we have coped, but we are now getting to the stage where wind farm developers are running out of areas to build away from airports,” he said. “If we are to meet renewables targets, we will need to see wind farms built in the vicinity of airports over the next few years. Then we will have to deal with the problem.”

Source: Aveillant

About the Author
Ben Coxworth An experienced freelance writer, videographer and television producer, Ben's interest in all forms of innovation is particularly fanatical when it comes to human-powered transportation, film-making gear, environmentally-friendly technologies and anything that's designed to go underwater. He lives in Edmonton, Alberta, where he spends a lot of time going over the handlebars of his mountain bike, hanging out in off-leash parks, and wishing the Pacific Ocean wasn't so far away.   All articles by Ben Coxworth
Tags
3 Comments

I think it would be cheaper to put a IFR device on the windmills. Then the most basic computerized radar system could be programed to not display the return.

Pikeman
30th November, 2012 @ 10:16 pm PST

Wind Turbines are often detected and displayed on ATC primary surveillance radars. SSR radar are not normally affected.

Sometimes air traffic controllers can tolerate this clutter. The wind farm area can be marked so that controllers are aware of the clutter source.

Sometimes the clutter effects can be removed or limited by blanking the radar or establishing Non Auto Initiation Zones. Sometimes effects can be mitigated operationally through airspace or other changes. It is not always necessary to source a new or alternate radar.

MikeWatson
2nd December, 2012 @ 10:43 am PST

Any plane flying only 100 metres above the ground would be *rather* suspicious to your average air traffic controller I would have thought. They'd know to block it out readily.

William Blackburn
2nd December, 2012 @ 04:39 pm PST
Post a Comment

Login with your gizmag account:

Or Login with Facebook:


Related Articles
Looking for something? Search our 28,274 articles